BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19928073)

  • 1. Evaluation of scatter effects on image quality for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Boone JM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4425-32. PubMed ID: 19928073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
    Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT energy weighting in the presence of scatter and limited energy resolution.
    Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1056-67. PubMed ID: 20384241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A deep learning approach to estimate x-ray scatter in digital breast tomosynthesis: From phantom models to clinical applications.
    Pinto MC; Mauter F; Michielsen K; Biniazan R; Kappler S; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4744-4757. PubMed ID: 37394837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully iterative scatter corrected digital breast tomosynthesis using GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation and composition ratio update.
    Kim K; Lee T; Seong Y; Lee J; Jang KE; Choi J; Choi YW; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Cho S; Ye JC
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5342-55. PubMed ID: 26328983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.
    Jia Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6643-53. PubMed ID: 22149846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power spectrum analysis of the x-ray scatter signal in mammography and breast tomosynthesis projections.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101905. PubMed ID: 24089907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep learning for x-ray scatter correction in dedicated breast CT.
    Pautasso JJ; Caballo M; Mikerov M; Boone JM; Michielsen K; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2022-2036. PubMed ID: 36565012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. X-ray scatter correction in breast tomosynthesis with a precomputed scatter map library.
    Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS; Seidel RL; Patel B; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031912. PubMed ID: 24593730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesis.
    Ullman G; Dance DR; Sandborg M; Carlsson GA; Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):159-63. PubMed ID: 20203125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient Monte Carlo based scatter artifact reduction in cone-beam micro-CT.
    Zbijewski W; Beekman FJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jul; 25(7):817-27. PubMed ID: 16827483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT.
    Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Bakhtiar B; Moseley DJ; Richard S; Keller H; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 16485425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.