These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19928096)

  • 1. A theoretical study on phase-contrast mammography with Thomson-scattering x-ray sources.
    De Caro L; Giannini C; Bellotti R; Tangaro S
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4644-53. PubMed ID: 19928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulation of breast imaging using synchrotron radiation.
    Fitousi NT; Delis H; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2069-77. PubMed ID: 22482628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.
    Zysk AM; Brankov JG; Wernick MN; Anastasio MA
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):906-11. PubMed ID: 22320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beam collimation with polycapillary x-ray optics for high contrast high resolution monochromatic imaging.
    Sugiro FR; Li D; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3288-97. PubMed ID: 15651611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-resolution CT by diffraction-enhanced x-ray imaging: mapping of breast tissue samples and comparison with their histo-pathology.
    Bravin A; Keyriläinen J; Fernández M; Fiedler S; Nemoz C; Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML; Tenhunen M; Virkkunen P; Leidenius M; von Smitten K; Sipilä P; Suortti P
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2197-211. PubMed ID: 17404464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
    Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
    Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. X-ray phase-contrast tomosynthesis for improved breast tissue discrimination.
    Schleede S; Bech M; Grandl S; Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Mayr D; Stockmar M; Potdevin G; Zanette I; Rack A; Weitkamp T; Pfeiffer F
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 24387825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of x-ray differential phase contrast computed tomography (PCT) with respect to medical imaging.
    Raupach R; Flohr T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4761-74. PubMed ID: 22894401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phase-contrast X-ray imaging of breast.
    Keyriläinen J; Bravin A; Fernández M; Tenhunen M; Virkkunen P; Suortti P
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):866-84. PubMed ID: 20799921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography.
    Donnelly EF; Price RR; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2888-96. PubMed ID: 14655935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The second-order differential phase contrast and its retrieval for imaging with x-ray Talbot interferometry.
    Yang Y; Tang X
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7237-53. PubMed ID: 23231275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
    Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Golosio B; Oliva P; Spandre G; Di Lillo F; Fedon C; Longo R; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 27160829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
    Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT energy weighting in the presence of scatter and limited energy resolution.
    Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1056-67. PubMed ID: 20384241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.