These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19929254)

  • 1. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
    Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
    Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
    Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Kim HY; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color doppler US--influence on radiologist accuracy.
    Cho N; Jang M; Lyou CY; Park JS; Choi HY; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 22084209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
    Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
    Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography: how much is it helpful for diagnostic performance?
    Sohn YM; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Moon HJ; Kim SJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Apr; 28(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 19321669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
    Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
    Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
    Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
    Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
    Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
    Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
    Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast sonographic elastography using an advanced breast tissue-specific imaging preset: initial clinical results.
    Jung HJ; Hahn SY; Choi HY; Park SH; Park HK
    J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 22298871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.