These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19929897)

  • 1. The way of our errors: theme and variations.
    Simons RF
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jan; 47(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 19929897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of interpersonal competition on monitoring internal and external error feedback.
    Van Meel CS; Van Heijningen CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 20074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retest reliability of medial frontal negativities during performance monitoring.
    Segalowitz SJ; Santesso DL; Murphy TI; Homan D; Chantziantoniou DK; Khan S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20030755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring.
    Gehring WJ; Knight RT
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 May; 3(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 10769394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring.
    Müller SV; Möller J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Münte TF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 15589185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural dynamics of error processing in medial frontal cortex.
    Mars RB; Coles MG; Grol MJ; Holroyd CB; Nieuwenhuis S; Hulstijn W; Toni I
    Neuroimage; 2005 Dec; 28(4):1007-13. PubMed ID: 16055352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic association studies of performance monitoring and learning from feedback: the role of dopamine and serotonin.
    Ullsperger M
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2010 Apr; 34(5):649-59. PubMed ID: 19563825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of intact frontostriatal circuits in error processing.
    Ullsperger M; von Cramon DY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 16768367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Schurger A; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jul; 14(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15054053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning by doing: an fMRI study of feedback-related brain activations.
    Marco-Pallarés J; Müller SV; Münte TF
    Neuroreport; 2007 Sep; 18(14):1423-6. PubMed ID: 17712267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging, probabilistic learning and performance monitoring.
    Pietschmann M; Endrass T; Czerwon B; Kathmann N
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 21056080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feedback-based error monitoring processes during musical performance: an ERP study.
    Katahira K; Abla D; Masuda S; Okanoya K
    Neurosci Res; 2008 May; 61(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 18359117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The prefrontal cortex: composer and conductor of voluntary behaviors].
    Levy R; Volle E
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2009 Sep; 165 Spec No 3():F159-77. PubMed ID: 20222196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involvement of medial prefrontal cortex in emotion during feedback presentation.
    Jimura K; Konishi S; Asari T; Miyashita Y
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jun; 20(9):886-90. PubMed ID: 19436227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental changes in performance monitoring: how electrophysiological data can enhance our understanding of error and feedback processing in childhood and adolescence.
    Ferdinand NK; Kray J
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 263():122-32. PubMed ID: 24487012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning to become an expert: reinforcement learning and the acquisition of perceptual expertise.
    Krigolson OE; Pierce LJ; Holroyd CB; Tanaka JW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 18823237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.
    Ullsperger M; von Cramon DY
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1387-401. PubMed ID: 11707094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Switching between colors and shapes on the basis of positive and negative feedback: an fMRI and EEG study on feedback-based learning.
    Zanolie K; Teng S; Donohue SE; van Duijvenvoorde AC; Band GP; Rombouts SA; Crone EA
    Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 18387586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.