BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19930146)

  • 1. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tribonias G; Theodoropoulou A; Konstantinidis K; Vardas E; Karmiris K; Chroniaris N; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct; 12(10 Online):e260-6. PubMed ID: 19930146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
    East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study.
    Rastogi A; Keighley J; Singh V; Callahan P; Bansal A; Wani S; Sharma P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Oct; 104(10):2422-30. PubMed ID: 19584829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.
    Subramanian V; Mannath J; Hawkey CJ; Ragunath K
    Endoscopy; 2011 Jun; 43(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 21360420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.
    Pasha SF; Leighton JA; Das A; Harrison ME; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Fleischer DE; Sharma VK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 107(3):363-70; quiz 371. PubMed ID: 22186978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study.
    Le Rhun M; Coron E; Parlier D; Nguyen JM; Canard JM; Alamdari A; Sautereau D; Chaussade S; Galmiche JP
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Mar; 4(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 16527699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy--a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis.
    Rastogi A; Bansal A; Wani S; Callahan P; McGregor DH; Cherian R; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Feb; 67(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 18155210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology.
    Rastogi A; Early DS; Gupta N; Bansal A; Singh V; Ansstas M; Jonnalagadda SS; Hovis CE; Gaddam S; Wani SB; Edmundowicz SA; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):593-602. PubMed ID: 21802078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.
    Deenadayalu VP; Chadalawada V; Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2138-42. PubMed ID: 15554993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
    Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
    Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial.
    Adler A; Aschenbeck J; Yenerim T; Mayr M; Aminalai A; Drossel R; Schröder A; Scheel M; Wiedenmann B; Rösch T
    Gastroenterology; 2009 Feb; 136(2):410-6.e1; quiz 715. PubMed ID: 19014944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased polyp detection using narrow band imaging compared with high resolution endoscopy in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome.
    Boparai KS; van den Broek FJ; van Eeden S; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):676-82. PubMed ID: 21811939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pellisé M; Fernández-Esparrach G; Cárdenas A; Sendino O; Ricart E; Vaquero E; Gimeno-García AZ; de Miguel CR; Zabalza M; Ginès A; Piqué JM; Llach J; Castells A
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Oct; 135(4):1062-8. PubMed ID: 18725223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.
    Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
    Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Ng SC; Tsoi KK; Hirai HW; Lee YT; Wu JC; Sung JJ; Chan FK; Lau JY
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 107(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 22664471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-definition vs. standard-definition colonoscopy in the characterization of small colonic polyps: results from a randomized trial.
    Longcroft-Wheaton G; Brown J; Cowlishaw D; Higgins B; Bhandari P
    Endoscopy; 2012 Oct; 44(10):905-10. PubMed ID: 22893132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.