These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19930177)

  • 1. Pathological findings and prostate-specific antigen outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Ploussard G; Salomon L; Allory Y; Terry S; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Vacherot F; de la Taille A
    BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19930177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
    Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between age at time of surgery and risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Barlow LJ; Badalato GM; Bashir T; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
    BJU Int; 2010 Jun; 105(12):1646-9. PubMed ID: 19863523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of prostate-specific antigen testing on the clinical and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 cancers.
    Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Blute ML
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 17922854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
    Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H
    BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
    Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
    Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer defined by preoperative criteria: oncologic follow-up in national multicenter study in 813 patients and assessment of easy-to-use prognostic substratification.
    Ploussard G; Masson-Lecomte A; Beauval JB; Ouzzane A; Bonniol R; Buge F; Fadli S; Rouprêt M; Rebillard X; Gaschignard N; Pfister C; Villers A; Soulié M; Salomon L;
    Urology; 2011 Sep; 78(3):607-13. PubMed ID: 21783233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience.
    Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods.
    Yossepowitch O; Eggener SE; Bianco FJ; Carver BS; Serio A; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):493-9; discussion 499. PubMed ID: 17561152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Recurrence following radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Analysis of clinical, biological and anatomo-pathological prognostic factors].
    Feyaerts A; Delrée A; Lorge F; Opsomer RJ; Wese FX; Van Cangh PJ; Draguet AP; Cosyns JP
    Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Mar; 65(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9245198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.