These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1993032)

  • 21. Intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Keeler Pulsair tonometer.
    Evans K; Wishart PK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 1454364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microprocessor controlled tonometry.
    Draeger J; Rumberger E; Dauper J; Deutsch C
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():738-42. PubMed ID: 2630355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eye retraction and rotation during Corvis ST 'air puff' intraocular pressure measurement and its quantitative analysis.
    Boszczyk A; Kasprzak H; Jóźwik A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):253-262. PubMed ID: 28439976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The Pulsair manual noncontact tonometer].
    Bartos D; Skopový M
    Cesk Oftalmol; 1991 Feb; 47(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 1913887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Thompson JR; Deutsch J; Misson GP; Naylor G; Tan-Yee A; Taylor RH; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye.
    Vernon SA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1989 Apr; 73(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 2713301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Hepsen IF; Yagci R
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 18259205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intra-eye pressure range and pulse profiles in normals with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Vernon SA
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():134-7. PubMed ID: 8325403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the Pulsair noncontact tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Climenhaga H; Plucinska H
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb; 24(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 2713754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology.
    von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24131625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M; Hoffmann OF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hydrodynamic Interaction Between Tear Film and Air Puff From Noncontact Tonometry.
    Yousefi A; Ma Y; Roberts CJ; Moroi SE; Reilly MA
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 11(2):2. PubMed ID: 35103798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Corneal epithelial alterations resulting from use of chlorine-disinfected contact tonometer after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
    Maldonado MJ
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug; 105(8):1546-9. PubMed ID: 9709772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Non-contact tonometry: an ideal method for mass screening.
    Choi WJ; Kim JW; Tchah H; Jin YH; Kim YJ
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 4(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 2214249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Significance of the corneal thickness in non-contact tonometry].
    Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Sep; 199(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 1753670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW; Jay JL; Ackerley R; Walsh G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.