131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19931022)
1. Utility of megavoltage fan-beam CT for treatment planning in a head-and-neck cancer patient with extensive dental fillings undergoing helical tomotherapy.
Yang C; Liu T; Jennelle RL; Ryu JK; Vijayakumar S; Purdy JA; Chen AM
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 19931022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation and experimental evaluation of Mega-voltage fan-beam CT using a linear accelerator.
Gong H; Tao S; Gagneur JD; Liu W; Shen J; McCollough CH; Hu Y; Leng S
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):139. PubMed ID: 34321029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Generation of hybrid sinograms for the recovery of kV-CT images with metal artifacts for helical tomotherapy.
Jeon H; Park D; Youn H; Nam J; Lee J; Kim W; Ki Y; Kim YH; Lee JH; Kim D; Kim HK
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4654-67. PubMed ID: 26233193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The dosimetric effect of zipper artifacts on tomotherapy adaptive dose calculation--a phantom study.
Geng H; Yu SK; Lam WW; Wong WK; Ho YW; Liu SF
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 21093252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration of megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiotherapy dose calculations: correction of cupping artifacts and conversion of CT numbers to electron density.
Petit SF; van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Lambin P; Dekker AL
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):849-65. PubMed ID: 18404922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Feasibility Study on the Use of TomoTherapy Megavoltage Computed Tomography Images for Palliative Patient Treatment Planning.
Hu Y; Byrne M; Archibald-Heeren B; Squires M; Teh A; Seiffert K; Cheers S; Wang Y
J Med Phys; 2017; 42(3):163-170. PubMed ID: 28974863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Megavoltage CT in helical tomotherapy - clinical advantages and limitations of special physical characteristics.
Sterzing F; Kalz J; Sroka-Perez G; Schubert K; Bischof M; Roder F; Debus J; Herfarth K
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Oct; 8(5):343-52. PubMed ID: 19754210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Use of megavoltage CT(MVCT) in helical tomotherapy for head and neck dose calculation].
Dai X; Wang Y; Feng L; Yu W
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 38(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 24941783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Helical tomotherapy. Experiences of the first 150 patients in Heidelberg.
Sterzing F; Schubert K; Sroka-Perez G; Kalz J; Debus J; Herfarth K
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Jan; 184(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 18188517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy in a patient with bilateral hip prostheses planned using megavoltage computed tomography images acquired with a helical tomotherapy unit.
Holly R; Myrehaug S; Kamran A; Sankreacha R; Morton G
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 19041281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of normalized metal artifact reduction in kVCT using MVCT prior images (MVCT-NMAR) for radiation therapy treatment planning.
Paudel MR; Mackenzie M; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):682-9. PubMed ID: 24751408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of Variation in Dose Calculation Accuracy Between kV Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and kV fan-Beam Computed Tomography.
Kaliyaperumal V; Raphael CJ; Varghese KM; Gopu P; Sivakumar S; Boban M; Raj NAN; Senthilnathan K; Babu PR
J Med Phys; 2017; 42(3):171-180. PubMed ID: 28974864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of megavoltage computed tomography images from a helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes.
Forrest LJ; Mackie TR; Ruchala K; Turek M; Kapatoes J; Jaradat H; Hui S; Balog J; Vail DM; Mehta MP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1639-44. PubMed ID: 15590196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.
Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SU-E-J-27: Effects of Metal Artifacts of KV and MV CT Images on Structure Delineation and Tissue Electron/Mass Density Calculation.
He T; Tanyi J; Crilly R; Laub W
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3658. PubMed ID: 28517585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation.
Yang Y; Schreibmann E; Li T; Wang C; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):685-705. PubMed ID: 17228114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normal tissue dose and second cancer risk due to megavoltage fan-beam CT, static tomotherapy and helical tomotherapy in breast radiotherapy.
Quinn A; Holloway L; Hardcastle N; Tomé WA; Rosenfeld A; Metcalfe P
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Aug; 108(2):266-8. PubMed ID: 23849173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction.
Giantsoudi D; De Man B; Verburg J; Trofimov A; Jin Y; Wang G; Gjesteby L; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(8):R49-R80. PubMed ID: 28323641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
