These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19931202)

  • 1. Aging effects on event and emergent timing in bimanual coordination.
    Summers JJ; Lewis J; Fujiyama H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Oct; 29(5):820-30. PubMed ID: 19931202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coordination dynamics and attentional costs of continuous and discontinuous bimanual circle drawing movements.
    Summers JJ; Maeder S; Hiraga CY; Alexander JR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Oct; 27(5):823-37. PubMed ID: 18226840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinct timing mechanisms are implicated in distinct circle drawing tasks.
    Huys R; Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN; Jirsa VK
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Mar; 472(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 20117170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous event-based and emergent timing: synchronization, continuation, and phase correction.
    Repp BH; Steinman SR
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(2):111-26. PubMed ID: 20189907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Circle drawing does not exhibit auditory-motor synchronization.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 21462066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the timing basis of bimanual coordination in discrete and continuous tasks.
    Semjen A
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Feb; 48(1):133-48. PubMed ID: 11812038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct ways of timing movements in bimanual coordination tasks: contribution of serial correlation analysis and implications for modeling.
    Torre K; Delignières D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18799152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dynamic systems approach to the effects of aging on bimanual coordination.
    Temprado JJ; Vercruysse S; Salesse R; Berton E
    Gerontology; 2010; 56(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 19940462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weber (slope) analyses of timing variability in tapping and drawing tasks.
    Spencer RM; Zelaznik HN
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Dec; 35(4):371-81. PubMed ID: 14607774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.
    Lüttgen J; Heuer H
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23663189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fractal models for event-based and dynamical timers.
    Delignières D; Torre K; Lemoine L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):382-97. PubMed ID: 17854754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The distinction between tapping and circle drawing with and without tactile feedback: an examination of the sources of timing variance.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN; Balasubramaniam R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1086-100. PubMed ID: 22332846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced basal ganglia function when elderly switch between coordinated movement patterns.
    Coxon JP; Goble DJ; Van Impe A; De Vos J; Wenderoth N; Swinnen SP
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Oct; 20(10):2368-79. PubMed ID: 20080932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synchronization in repetitive smooth movement requires perceptible events.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):432-41. PubMed ID: 21300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of dominant versus non-dominant hand on event and emergent motor timing.
    Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Feb; 27(1):29-52. PubMed ID: 18191491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related differences in inhibitory processes during interlimb coordination.
    Fujiyama H; Garry MI; Levin O; Swinnen SP; Summers JJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1262():38-47. PubMed ID: 19368842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing processes are correlated when tasks share a salient event.
    Zelaznik HN; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1565-75. PubMed ID: 20731516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of attentional prioritisation on the temporal and spatial components of an interlimb circle-drawing task.
    Hiraga CY; Summers JJ; Temprado JJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005; 24(5-6):815-32. PubMed ID: 16337296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of aging on movement related cortical potentials during a face naming task.
    Buján A; Lindín M; Díaz F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Nov; 78(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 20708041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ERP study of age-related differences in the central cost of interlimb coordination.
    Fujiyama H; Garry MI; Martin FH; Summers JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2010 May; 47(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 20102535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.