These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19932044)

  • 1. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties.
    Bryan R; Mohan PS; Hopkins A; Galloway F; Taylor M; Nair PB
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 19932044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What makes an accurate and reliable subject-specific finite element model? A case study of an elephant femur.
    Panagiotopoulou O; Wilshin SD; Rayfield EJ; Shefelbine SJ; Hutchinson JR
    J R Soc Interface; 2012 Feb; 9(67):351-61. PubMed ID: 21752810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal medical imaging can accurately reconstruct geometric bone models for musculoskeletal models.
    Suwarganda EK; Diamond LE; Lloyd DG; Besier TF; Zhang J; Killen BA; Savage TN; Saxby DJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0205628. PubMed ID: 30742643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statistical shape analysis for the assessment of the main geometrical features of the distal femoral medullary canal.
    Betti V; Aldieri A; Cristofolini L
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1250095. PubMed ID: 38659643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scan-Free and Fully Automatic Tracking of Native Knee Anatomy from Dynamic Stereo-Radiography with Statistical Shape and Intensity Models.
    Burton W; Myers C; Stefanovic M; Shelburne K; Rullkoetter P
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2024 Jun; 52(6):1591-1603. PubMed ID: 38558356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmentation of the aorta in systolic phase from 4D flow MRI: multi-atlas vs. deep learning.
    Marin-Castrillon DM; Geronzi L; Boucher A; Lin S; Morgant MC; Cochet A; Rochette M; Leclerc S; Ambarki K; Jin N; Aho LS; Lalande A; Bouchot O; Presles B
    MAGMA; 2023 Oct; 36(5):687-700. PubMed ID: 36800143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust automatic hexahedral cartilage meshing framework enables population-based computational studies of the knee.
    Gibbons KD; Malbouby V; Alvarez O; Fitzpatrick CK
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1059003. PubMed ID: 36568304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element modelling for footwear design and evaluation: A systematic scoping review.
    Song Y; Shao E; Bíró I; Baker JS; Gu Y
    Heliyon; 2022 Oct; 8(10):e10940. PubMed ID: 36247144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphological variation in paediatric lower limb bones.
    Carman L; Besier TF; Choisne J
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):3251. PubMed ID: 35228607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomical fitting of a plate shape directly derived from a 3D statistical bone model of the tibia.
    Schmutz B; Rathnayaka K; Albrecht T
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2019 Oct; 10(Suppl 1):S236-S241. PubMed ID: 31700213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1-population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling.
    Steer JW; Worsley PR; Browne M; Dickinson AS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1331-1346. PubMed ID: 31256276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia.
    Gaffney BMM; Hillen TJ; Nepple JJ; Clohisy JC; Harris MD
    J Orthop Res; 2019 Mar; 37(3):665-673. PubMed ID: 30656719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical modeling of the equine third metacarpal bone incorporating morphology and bone mineral density.
    Liley H; Zhang J; Firth EC; Fernandez JW; Besier TF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0194406. PubMed ID: 29874224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The potential of statistical shape modelling for geometric morphometric analysis of human teeth in archaeological research.
    Woods C; Fernee C; Browne M; Zakrzewski S; Dickinson A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0186754. PubMed ID: 29216199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical shape modeling predicts patellar bone geometry to enable stereo-radiographic kinematic tracking.
    Smoger LM; Shelburne KB; Cyr AJ; Rullkoetter PJ; Laz PJ
    J Biomech; 2017 Jun; 58():187-194. PubMed ID: 28554493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of Uncertainty and Variability in Finite Element Computational Models for Biomedical Engineering: Characterization and Propagation.
    Mangado N; Piella G; Noailly J; Pons-Prats J; Ballester MÁ
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2016; 4():85. PubMed ID: 27872840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometry reconstruction method for patient-specific finite element models for the assessment of tibia fracture risk in osteogenesis imperfecta.
    Caouette C; Ikin N; Villemure I; Arnoux PJ; Rauch F; Aubin CÉ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Apr; 55(4):549-560. PubMed ID: 27314506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiscale musculoskeletal modelling, data-model fusion and electromyography-informed modelling.
    Fernandez J; Zhang J; Heidlauf T; Sartori M; Besier T; Röhrle O; Lloyd D
    Interface Focus; 2016 Apr; 6(2):20150084. PubMed ID: 27051510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical modeling to characterize relationships between knee anatomy and kinematics.
    Smoger LM; Fitzpatrick CK; Clary CW; Cyr AJ; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ; Laz PJ
    J Orthop Res; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1620-30. PubMed ID: 25991502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.
    Harris MD; Datar M; Whitaker RT; Jurrus ER; Peters CL; Anderson AE
    J Orthop Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1620-6. PubMed ID: 23832798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.