These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19932417)

  • 1. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    McDermott CD; Hale DS
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2009 Sep; 36(3):585-614. PubMed ID: 19932417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective.
    Burgess KL; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Paraiso MF; Chen CC
    Minerva Ginecol; 2006 Oct; 58(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 17006425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted techniques and outcomes in the realm of pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Parnell BA; Matthews CA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):412-9. PubMed ID: 21857171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
    Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of apical support defect: correction in women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery.
    Alas AN; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 26(5):386-92. PubMed ID: 25136761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advances in urogynaecological robotic surgery.
    Swan K; Advincula AP
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1024-7. PubMed ID: 21917106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
    Paraiso MF
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Crigler B; Zakaria M; Hart S
    Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():195-202. PubMed ID: 23225594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Young SB
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2009 Sep; 36(3):565-84. PubMed ID: 19932416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive approach to pelvic organ prolapse: a review.
    Tarr ME; Paraiso MF
    Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Feb; 66(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 24569404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
    Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
    Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
    Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is robotic sacrocolpopexy a marketing gimmick or a technological advancement?
    Kim JH; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Jul; 20(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 21475070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.