These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19932473)
1. Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars. Scott RB; Dienes Z Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):372-88. PubMed ID: 19932473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Knowledge applied to new domains: the unconscious succeeds where the conscious fails. Scott RB; Dienes Z Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):391-8. PubMed ID: 20007018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity. Scott RB; Dienes Z J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1264-88. PubMed ID: 18763904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning. Wan L; Dienes Z; Fu X Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 18667335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prior familiarity with components enhances unconscious learning of relations. Scott RB; Dienes Z Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):413-8. PubMed ID: 20096605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality. Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning. Seger CA Conscious Cogn; 1998 Jun; 7(2):259-84. PubMed ID: 9690029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Topolinski S; Strack F J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The inferior frontal cortex in artificial syntax processing: an rTMS study. Uddén J; Folia V; Forkstam C; Ingvar M; Fernandez G; Overeem S; van Elswijk G; Hagoort P; Petersson KM Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1224():69-78. PubMed ID: 18617159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Theories of artificial grammar learning. Pothos EM Psychol Bull; 2007 Mar; 133(2):227-44. PubMed ID: 17338598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tonal Symmetry Induces Fluency and Sense of Well-Formedness. Qiao F; Sun F; Li F; Ling X; Zheng L; Li L; Guo X; Dienes Z Front Psychol; 2018; 9():165. PubMed ID: 29527181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implicit learning and dyslexia. Folia V; Uddén J; Forkstam C; Ingvar M; Hagoort P; Petersson KM Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Dec; 1145():132-50. PubMed ID: 19076394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Project DyAdd: implicit learning in adult dyslexia and ADHD. Laasonen M; Väre J; Oksanen-Hennah H; Leppämäki S; Tani P; Harno H; Hokkanen L; Pothos E; Cleeremans A Ann Dyslexia; 2014 Apr; 64(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 24162872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring "fringe" consciousness: the subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Reber R; Wurtz P; Zimmermann TD Conscious Cogn; 2004 Mar; 13(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 14990240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modes of knowledge acquisition and retrieval in artificial grammar learning. Poznanski Y; Tzelgov J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1495-515. PubMed ID: 20063258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring strategic control in artificial grammar learning. Norman E; Price MC; Jones E Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1920-9. PubMed ID: 21824790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]