230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19932853)
41. Electroglottographic and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech.
Kazi R; Kanagalingam J; Venkitaraman R; Prasad V; Clarke P; Nutting CM; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington KJ
J Voice; 2009 Mar; 23(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 17490856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Acoustic analysis of voice quality with or without false vocal fold displacement after cordectomy.
Bertino G; Bellomo A; Ferrero FE; Ferlito A
J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 12269628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Behavior of the cricopharyngeal segment during esophageal phonation in laryngectomized patients.
Aguiar-Ricz L; Dantas RO; Ricz H; Gielow I; Mamede RC; Perdoná GC
J Voice; 2007 Mar; 21(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 16504467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of antituberculosis treatment on self assessment, perceptual analysis and acoustic analysis of voice quality in laryngeal tuberculosis patients.
Yelken K; Guven M; Topak M; Gultekin E; Turan F
J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Apr; 122(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 17592656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Multidimensional assessment of voice and speech after supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy.
Yücetürk AV; Günhan K
J Laryngol Otol; 2004 Oct; 118(10):791-5. PubMed ID: 15550186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Acoustic analysis of tracheoesophageal speech in comparison to esophageal speech after total laryngectomy].
Olszański W; Gieroba R; Warchoł J; Morshed K; Gołabek W
Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 15311589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy by the Gronigen prosthesis].
Manni JJ; van den Broek P; de Groot MA
HNO; 1985 May; 33(5):216-9. PubMed ID: 4008280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Impact of aberrant acoustic properties on the perception of sound quality in electrolarynx speech.
Meltzner GS; Hillman RE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):766-79. PubMed ID: 16378472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity.
van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF
Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Voice quality assessment via acoustic and spectrographic analysis in patients who had endolaryngeal microsurgery].
Göksel AO; Topaloğlu I
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(5):253-8. PubMed ID: 19961404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Results of voice rehabilitation with Provox prostheses].
Baumann A; Hotz MA; Zbären P
Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2000; 116():77S-79S. PubMed ID: 10780079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Voice quality and intelligibility characteristics of the reconstructed larynx and pseudolarynx.
Rizer FM; Schechter GL; Coleman RF
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1984 Dec; 92(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 6440080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal voice in male total laryngectomy patients.
Deore N; Datta S; Dwivedi RC; Palav R; Shah R; Sayed SI; Jagde M; Kazi R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Oct; 93(7):523-7. PubMed ID: 22004634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Voice and spirometric function i patients after expanded fronto-lateral laryngectomy by using the Szmeja method].
Pruszewicz M; Szmeja Z; Kruk-Zagajewska A; Szyfter W; Soboczyński R
Otolaryngol Pol; 1995; 49(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 7644196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Multidimensional assessment of voice after vertical partial laryngectomy: a comparison with normal and total laryngectomy voice.
Singh A; Kazi R; De Cordova J; Nutting CM; Clarke P; Harrington KJ; RhysEvans P
J Voice; 2008 Nov; 22(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 18207363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The aging voice.
Mueller PB
Semin Speech Lang; 1997 May; 18(2):159-68; quiz 168-9. PubMed ID: 9195688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical phase I/feasibility study of the next generation indwelling Provox voice prosthesis (Provox Vega).
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; van Rossum M; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 19895334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Voice change in end-stage renal disease patients after hemodialysis: correlation of subjective hoarseness and objective acoustic parameters.
Jung SY; Ryu JH; Park HS; Chung SM; Ryu DR; Kim HS
J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 24275458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessment of a method for the automatic on/off control of an electrolarynx via lip deformation.
Wan C; Wu L; Wu H; Wang S; Wan M
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):674.e21-30. PubMed ID: 22801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cepstral, Spectral and Time-Based Analysis of Voices of Esophageal Speakers.
Shim HJ; Jang HR; Shin HB; Ko DH
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 26575366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
