These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19933456)

  • 1. Effects of spatial configurations on visual change detection: an account of bias changes.
    Boduroglu A; Shah P
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1120-31. PubMed ID: 19933456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Rasmussen IP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 20515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of location and visual features on visual object memory.
    Sun HM; Gordon RD
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1049-57. PubMed ID: 21156869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The spatial mismatch effect is based on global configuration and not on perceptual records within the visual cache.
    Zimmer HD; Lehnert G
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jan; 70(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 15503130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
    Wood JN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color.
    Logie RH; Brockmole JR; Jaswal S
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 21264632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representation of dynamic spatial configurations in visual short-term memory.
    Papenmeier F; Huff M; Schwan S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):397-415. PubMed ID: 22090188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual short-term memory operates more efficiently on boundary features than on surface features.
    Alvarez GA; Cavanagh P
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):346-64. PubMed ID: 18372755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organization of visual short-term memory.
    Jiang Y; Olson IR; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):683-702. PubMed ID: 10855426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. (Re-)organisation of spatial configurations in visual working memory: The fate of objects rendered relevant or irrelevant by selective attention.
    Timm JD; Papenmeier F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2246-2259. PubMed ID: 32749199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Configural representations in spatial working memory: modulation by perceptual segregation and voluntary attention.
    Gmeindl L; Nelson JK; Wiggin T; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2130-42. PubMed ID: 21761373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset.
    Friedman-Hill S; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):531-51. PubMed ID: 7790832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference between object-based attention and object-based memory.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 19451380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual awareness of objects and their colour.
    Pilling M; Gellatly A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2026-43. PubMed ID: 21695593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():90-106. PubMed ID: 26394018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects.
    Flombaum JI; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 16846283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attribute conjunctions and the part configuration advantage in object category learning.
    Saiki J; Hummel JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Jul; 22(4):1002-19. PubMed ID: 8708600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.