These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19933461)

  • 1. Acquiring experiential traces in word-referent learning.
    Richter T; Zwaan RA; Hoever I
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1187-96. PubMed ID: 19933461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of perceptual information in word access.
    Richter T; Zwaan RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 19424906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words.
    Amit E; Algom D; Trope Y
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):400-15. PubMed ID: 19653798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning and retrieving holistic and componential visual-verbal associations in reading and object naming.
    Quinn C; Taylor JSH; Davis MH
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():68-84. PubMed ID: 27720949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning.
    McMurray B; Horst JS; Samuelson LK
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Oct; 119(4):831-77. PubMed ID: 23088341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of referent type and familiarity on word-referent mapping.
    Ong JH; Chan AHD
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219552. PubMed ID: 31291370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorizing chairs and naming pears: category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming.
    Lloyd-Jones TJ; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):606-24. PubMed ID: 9337580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Too Much of a Good Thing: How Novelty Biases and Vocabulary Influence Known and Novel Referent Selection in 18-Month-Old Children and Associative Learning Models.
    Kucker SC; McMurray B; Samuelson LK
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):463-493. PubMed ID: 29630722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.
    Carr TH; McCauley C; Sperber RD; Parmelee CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):757-77. PubMed ID: 6218234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual word learning in skilled readers of English.
    Kwok RK; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):326-49. PubMed ID: 25019273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recombinative reading derived from pseudoword instruction in a miniature linguistic system.
    Hanna ES; Kohlsdorf M; Quinteiro RS; de Melo RM; de Souza Dd; de Rose JC; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 21541169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.
    Morrison CM; Ellis AW; Quinlan PT
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 1435273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 18315411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depth of conceptual knowledge modulates visual processes during word reading.
    Rabovsky M; Sommer W; Abdel Rahman R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 21861677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Naming and categorizing objects: task differences modulate the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Mädebach A
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 22371163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: evidence from naming and object decision.
    Lloyd-Jones TJ; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 9046867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading and lexicalization in opaque and transparent orthographies: Word naming and word learning in English and Spanish.
    Kwok RK; Cuetos F; Avdyli R; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2105-2129. PubMed ID: 27609455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speakers gaze at objects while preparing intentionally inaccurate labels for them.
    Griffin ZM; Oppenheimer DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):943-8. PubMed ID: 16822160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age of acquisition effects on an object-name verification task.
    Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16464284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on levelt (2002).
    Bonin P; Chalard M; Méot A; Barry C
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1172-82. PubMed ID: 17128615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.