These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19933555)

  • 21. The influence of pretarget distracter stream properties on the skeletal attentional blink.
    Janson J; Thorne JD; Kranczioch C
    Neuroreport; 2014 Mar; 25(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 24300308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.
    Jannati A; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 21327367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural competition for conscious representation across time: an fMRI study.
    Slagter HA; Johnstone T; Beets IA; Davidson RJ
    PLoS One; 2010 May; 5(5):e10556. PubMed ID: 20479939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink.
    Vermeulen N; Godefroid J; Mermillod M
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e7924. PubMed ID: 19936235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The attentional blink: A relational accountof attentional engagement.
    Becker SI; Manoharan RT; Folk CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 32989720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The attentional blink and lag 1 sparing are nonspatial.
    Lunau R; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 20139448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stimulus localization interferes with stimulus recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.
    Griffiths G; Herwig A; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 23757511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Change is good: Inter-trial switching of target category improves attentional selection in time.
    Sdoia S; Ferlazzo F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():46-55. PubMed ID: 26722836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Failure of temporal selectivity: Electrophysiological evidence for (mis)selection of distractors during the attentional blink.
    Bourassa MÈ; Vachon F; Brisson B
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jul; 52(7):933-41. PubMed ID: 25854745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.
    Visser TA; Bischof WF; Di Lollo V
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1418-32. PubMed ID: 15813204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reconsidering Temporal Selection in the Attentional Blink.
    Goodbourn PT; Martini P; Barnett-Cowan M; Harris IM; Livesey EJ; Holcombe AO
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1146-56. PubMed ID: 27407133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: evidence from speeded and unspeeded task1 decisions.
    Jolicoeur P
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):1014-32. PubMed ID: 9796233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An attentional blink for nontargets?
    Meng M; Potter MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 21264713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dual task interference on early perceptual processing.
    Duncan J; Roberge A; Fortier-Gauthier U; Fiset D; Blais C; Brisson B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1777-1795. PubMed ID: 33083993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Temporal tuning and attentional gating: two distinct attentional mechanisms on the perception of rapid serial visual events.
    Ambinder MS; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1495-506. PubMed ID: 19801610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Word frequency and the attentional blink: the effects of target difficulty on retrieval and consolidation processes.
    Wierda SM; Taatgen NA; van Rijn H; Martens S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73415. PubMed ID: 24019921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks.
    Rusconi P; Huber DE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739. PubMed ID: 29030758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Different attentional blink tasks reflect distinct information processing limitations: an individual differences approach.
    Kelly AJ; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1867-73. PubMed ID: 22004195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of spatial switching in the attentional blink.
    Berthet V; Kouider S
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Mar; 15(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22379692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decomposing the attentional blink.
    Petersen A; Vangkilde S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Aug; 48(8):812-823. PubMed ID: 35708934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.