These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19933558)

  • 21. The influence of pretarget distracter stream properties on the skeletal attentional blink.
    Janson J; Thorne JD; Kranczioch C
    Neuroreport; 2014 Mar; 25(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 24300308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual search is postponed during the attentional blink until the system is suitably reconfigured.
    Ghorashi SM; Smilek D; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 17311483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Concurrency benefits in the attentional blink: attentional flexibility and shifts of decision criteria.
    Lapointe-Goupil R; Fortin C; Brisson B; Tremblay S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):374-88. PubMed ID: 21264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Greater attentional blink magnitude is associated with higher levels of anticipatory attention as measured by alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD).
    Maclean MH; Arnell KM
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():99-107. PubMed ID: 21362413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Illusory conjunctions reflect the time course of the attentional blink.
    Botella J; Privado J; de Liaño BG; Suero M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1361-73. PubMed ID: 21387080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential contributions of the intraparietal sulcus and the inferior parietal lobe to attentional blink: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Kihara K; Ikeda T; Matsuyoshi D; Hirose N; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Osaka N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 20044899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is all sparing created equal? Comparing lag-1 sparing and extended sparing in temporal object perception.
    Visser TA; Ohan JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1527-41. PubMed ID: 21553987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition.
    Kihara K; Yagi Y; Takeda Y; Kawahara JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):168-79. PubMed ID: 20731524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Jepma M; La Fors S; Olivers CN
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The attentional blink within and across the hemispheres: Evidence from a patient with a complete section of the corpus callosum.
    Ptito A; Brisson B; Dell'Acqua R; Lassonde M; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Sep; 82(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19539687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The attention cascade model and attentional blink.
    Shih SI
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 May; 56(3):210-36. PubMed ID: 17624321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenstein MR; Chun MM; van der Lubbe RH; Hooge IT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1463-75. PubMed ID: 16366802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combined effects of perceptual grouping cues on object representation: evidence from motion-induced blindness.
    Shibata M; Kawachi Y; Gyoba J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):387-97. PubMed ID: 20139454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention.
    Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 15828972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The attentional blink is susceptible to concurrent perceptual processing demands.
    Christmann C; Leuthold H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):357-77. PubMed ID: 14742180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different attentional blink tasks reflect distinct information processing limitations: an individual differences approach.
    Kelly AJ; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1867-73. PubMed ID: 22004195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Global and local attention in the attentional blink.
    Crewther DP; Lawson ML; Crewther SG
    J Vis; 2007 Dec; 7(14):9.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dual target identification and the attentional blink in Parkinson's disease.
    Vardy Y; Bradshaw JL; Iansek R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 May; 25(3):361-75. PubMed ID: 12916649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.
    Kawahara JI; Kihara K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 21113860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.