These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934033)

  • 1. Political partisanship influences perception of biracial candidates' skin tone.
    Caruso EM; Mead NL; Balcetis E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Dec; 106(48):20168-73. PubMed ID: 19934033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Government instability shifts skin tone representations of and intentions to vote for political candidates.
    Stern C; Balcetis E; Cole S; West TV; Caruso EM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jan; 110(1):76-95. PubMed ID: 26727665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Multiple-Matching Perspective on Value Versus Identity: Investigating How Political Ideology and Party Identity Contribute to Citizens' Support for Political Candidates.
    Bai H
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jan; 50(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 36113113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Political attitudes bias the mental representation of a presidential candidate's face.
    Young AI; Ratner KG; Fazio RH
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Feb; 25(2):503-10. PubMed ID: 24367060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Racial attitudes and visual cues in political judgments: support for Obama during the 2008 presidential election.
    West TV; Pearson AR; Dovidio JF; Johnson BT; Phills CE
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2014 Oct; 20(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 25090140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
    Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disclosing political partisanship polarizes first impressions of faces.
    Cassidy BS; Hughes C; Krendl AC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0276400. PubMed ID: 36350842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personality and political preferences over time: Evidence from a multiwave longitudinal study.
    Ekstrom PD; Federico CM
    J Pers; 2019 Apr; 87(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29806150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Godless by association: Deficits in trust mediate antiatheist stigma-by-association.
    Franks AS; Scherr KC; Gibson B
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):303-316. PubMed ID: 30024213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mortality Salience, System Justification, and Candidate Evaluations in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Sterling J; Jost JT; Shrout PE
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150556. PubMed ID: 26982197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image, issues, and ideology: the processing of information about political candidates.
    Wyer RS; Budesheim TL; Shavitt S; Riggle ED; Melton RJ; Kuklinski JH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Oct; 61(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 1960646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judging Political Hearts and Minds: How Political Dynamics Drive Social Judgments.
    Cornwell JF; Bajger AT; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26068717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias in the Flesh: Skin Complexion and Stereotype Consistency in Political Campaigns.
    Messing S; Jabon M; Plaut E
    Public Opin Q; 2016; 80(1):44-65. PubMed ID: 27257306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of Physician Organization-Affiliated Political Action Committee Contributions With US House of Representatives and Senate Candidates' Stances on Firearm Regulation.
    Schuur JD; Decker H; Baker O
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Feb; 2(2):e187831. PubMed ID: 30794295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of political candidates based on their stand on abortion and taxes.
    Dorman P; Pasadeos Y
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 1410119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.