These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934497)

  • 1. Impact of anti-scalant on fouling of reverse osmosis membranes in reclamation of secondary effluent.
    Qin JJ; Wai MN; Oo MH; Kekre KA; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(11):2767-74. PubMed ID: 19934497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation.
    Chen SC; Amy GL; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():144-155. PubMed ID: 26492341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low cost reclamation using the Advanced Integrated Wastewater Pond Systems Technology and reverse osmosis.
    Downing JB; Bracco E; Green FB; Ku AY; Lundquist TJ; Zubieta IX; Oswald WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 11833725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pilot study of a submerged membrane bioreactor for water reclamation.
    Qin JJ; Oo MH; Tao G; Kekre KA; Hashimoto T
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(12):3269-74. PubMed ID: 19955652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
    Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatty acid fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation.
    Ang WS; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2008 Oct; 42(16):4393-403. PubMed ID: 18760439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short- and long-term fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membrane at full scale leachate treatment plant.
    Rukapan W; Khananthai B; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Srisukphun T
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 22173416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of immersed MF (IMF) followed by reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for wastewater reclamation: A case study in Malaysia.
    Ujang Z; Ng KS; Tg Hamzah TH; Roger P; Ismail MR; Shahabudin SM; Abdul Hamid MH
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):103-8. PubMed ID: 18025737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RO brine treatment and recovery by biological activated carbon and capacitive deionization process.
    Tao G; Viswanath B; Kekre K; Lee LY; Ng HY; Ong SL; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 22053461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recycle unit wastewater treatment in petrochemical complex using reverse osmosis process.
    Madaeni SS; Eslamifard MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Feb; 174(1-3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19836881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
    Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent.
    Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):241-8. PubMed ID: 11436787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatability of organic fractions derived from secondary effluent by reverse osmosis membrane.
    Hu JY; Ong SL; Shan JH; Kang JB; Ng WJ
    Water Res; 2003 Nov; 37(19):4801-9. PubMed ID: 14568067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) between RO and NF processes for the reclamation of secondary effluent.
    Chang IS; Lee EW; Oh S; Kim Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):313-8. PubMed ID: 16003991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
    Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
    Ping Chu H; Li XY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.