These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934518)

  • 1. Dissolved methane in rising main sewer systems: field measurements and simple model development for estimating greenhouse gas emissions.
    Foley J; Yuan Z; Lant P
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(11):2963-71. PubMed ID: 19934518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a model for assessing methane formation in rising main sewers.
    Guisasola A; Sharma KR; Keller J; Yuan Z
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(11):2874-84. PubMed ID: 19423146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methane formation in sewer systems.
    Guisasola A; de Haas D; Keller J; Yuan Z
    Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1421-30. PubMed ID: 17988709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Vives CA
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 18060761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anaerobic digestion: impact of future greenhouse gases mitigation policies on methane generation and usage.
    Greenfield PF; Batstone DJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):39-47. PubMed ID: 16180407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Greenhouse gas emissions from a constructed wetland for municipal sewage treatment.
    Tai PD; Li PJ; Sun TH; He YW; Zhou QX; Gong ZQ; Mizuochi M; Inamori Y
    J Environ Sci (China); 2002 Jan; 14(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11887314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards a benchmarking tool for minimizing wastewater utility greenhouse gas footprints.
    Guo L; Porro J; Sharma KR; Amerlinck Y; Benedetti L; Nopens I; Shaw A; Van Hulle SW; Yuan Z; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(11):2483-95. PubMed ID: 23032782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing alternatives for mitigating net greenhouse gas emissions and increasing yields from rice production in China over the next twenty years.
    Li C; Salas W; DeAngelo B; Rose S
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1554-65. PubMed ID: 16825476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculator tool for determining greenhouse gas emissions for biosolids processing and end use.
    Brown S; Beecher N; Carpenter A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9509-15. PubMed ID: 21080649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Greenhouse gas emissions from surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating dairy wastewater.
    VanderZaag AC; Gordon RJ; Burton DL; Jamieson RC; Stratton GW
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(2):460-71. PubMed ID: 20176819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of sewage sludge treatment systems with different processes and scales.
    Soda S; Iwai Y; Sei K; Shimod Y; Ike M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 20107263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of reduced water consumption on sulfide and methane production in rising main sewers.
    Sun J; Hu S; Sharma KR; Bustamante H; Yuan Z
    J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():307-15. PubMed ID: 25748598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model for methane production in sewers.
    Chaosakul T; Koottatep T; Polprasert C
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2014 Sep; 49(11):1316-21. PubMed ID: 24967565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissolved methane in the influent of three Australian wastewater treatment plants fed by gravity sewers.
    Short MD; Daikeler A; Wallis K; Peirson WL; Peters GM
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 599-600():85-93. PubMed ID: 28472696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
    Tilche A; Galatola M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agricultural soil greenhouse gas emissions: a review of national inventory methods.
    Lokupitiya E; Paustian K
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1413-27. PubMed ID: 16825462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greenhouse gas production: a comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology.
    Cakir FY; Stenstrom MK
    Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(17):4197-203. PubMed ID: 16188289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of process design on greenhouse gas (GHG) generation by wastewater treatment plants.
    Bani Shahabadi M; Yerushalmi L; Haghighat F
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(10):2679-87. PubMed ID: 19375775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online dissolved methane and total dissolved sulfide measurement in sewers.
    Liu Y; Sharma KR; Fluggen M; O'Halloran K; Murthy S; Yuan Z
    Water Res; 2015 Jan; 68():109-18. PubMed ID: 25462721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.