These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934529)

  • 41. An application of Rasch analysis to the measurement of communicative functioning.
    Doyle PJ; Hula WD; McNeil MR; Mikolic JM; Matthews C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 48(6):1412-28. PubMed ID: 16478380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The recovery of the density scale using a stochastic quasi-realization of additive conjoint measurement.
    Pelton TW; Bunderson CV
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 12904677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Understanding the unit in the Rasch model.
    Humphry SM; Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 18753694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A confirmatory study of Rasch-based optimal categorization of a rating scale.
    Zhu W
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11997582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using paired comparison matrices to estimate parameters of the partial credit Rasch measurement model for rater-mediated assessments.
    Garner M; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 19299883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics.
    Wu M; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 24064576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Random parameter structure and the testlet model: extension of the Rasch testlet model.
    Paek I; Yon H; Wilson M; Kang T
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):394-407. PubMed ID: 19934527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: an assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1001-6. PubMed ID: 17325138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interpreting the chi-square statistics reported in the many-faceted Rasch model.
    Schumacker RE; Lunz ME
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(3):239-57. PubMed ID: 9661723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. "Just Another Statistic".
    Machtay M; Glatstein E
    Oncologist; 1998; 3(3):III-IV. PubMed ID: 10388105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Monte Carlo study of the impact of missing data and differential item functioning on theta estimates from two polytomous Rasch family models.
    Furlow CF; Fouladi RT; Gagne P; Whittaker TA
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):388-403. PubMed ID: 18250525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Effect of Interactions between Item Discrimination and Item Difficulty on Fit Statistics.
    Humphrey SM; Bredemeyer K
    J Appl Meas; 2020; 21(4):379-399. PubMed ID: 33989196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development of a comprehensiveness of Rasch measurement application scale.
    Lamprianou I
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(1):92-116. PubMed ID: 16385153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.
    Mallinson T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 17700332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An empirical study on the relationship between teacher's judgments and fit statistics of the partial credit model.
    Baek SG; Kim HS
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19299887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of 4 functional indexes in psoriatic arthritis with axial or peripheral disease subgroups using Rasch analyses.
    Leung YY; Tam LS; Kun EW; Ho KW; Li EK
    J Rheumatol; 2008 Aug; 35(8):1613-21. PubMed ID: 18597399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data.
    Smith AB; Rush R; Fallowfield LJ; Velikova G; Sharpe M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 May; 8():33. PubMed ID: 18510722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Using multidimensional Rasch to enhance measurement precision: initial results from simulation and empirical studies.
    Mok MM; Xu K
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 23442326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The autocorrelation coefficient as a tool for assessing goodness of fit between bioassay predictions and measurement data.
    Puncher M; Birchall A; Marsh JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):370-3. PubMed ID: 17553862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.