These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934529)

  • 61. Goodness-of-fit tests for ordinal response regression models.
    Pulkstenis E; Robinson TJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):999-1014. PubMed ID: 15027085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cholesky problems.
    Carey G
    Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):653-65. PubMed ID: 16184491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. An Examination of Sensitivity to Measurement Error in Rasch Residual-based Fit Statistics.
    Padgett RN; Morgan GB
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(4):354-366. PubMed ID: 31730543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Measuring disability: application of the Rasch model to activities of daily living (ADL/IADL).
    Sheehan TJ; DeChello LM; Garcia R; Fifield J; Rothfield N; Reisine S
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):839-63. PubMed ID: 16320552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Construct validity of scores/measures from a developmental assessment in mathematics using classical and many-facet Rasch measurement.
    Banerji M
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):177-98. PubMed ID: 12029177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Evidence for the validity of a Rasch model technique for identifying differential item functioning.
    Scheuneman JD; Subhiyah RG
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 9661730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Application of single-level and multi-level Rasch models using the lme4 package.
    Lamprianou I
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 23442329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Pseudolikelihood estimation of the Rasch model.
    Smit A; Kelderman H
    J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 11272599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):720-9. PubMed ID: 9629652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Substantive scale construction.
    Stone MH
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):282-97. PubMed ID: 12904678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Two strategies for fitting real data to Rasch polytomous models.
    Rojas Tejada AJ; Gonzalez Gomez A; Padilla Garcia JL; Perez Melendez C
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 12011498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.
    Ruscio J; Walters GD; Marcus DK; Kaczetow W
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 20230147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality on Type I and Type II Error Rates using the Q-Index Item Fit Statistic for the Rasch Model.
    Estrada S
    J Appl Meas; 2020; 21(4):496-514. PubMed ID: 33989202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Stability of INFIT and OUTFIT Compared to Simulated Estimates in Applied Setting.
    Hodge KJ; Morgan GB
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 29252207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Estimating tests including subtests.
    Brandt S
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):352-67. PubMed ID: 21164225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Is the partial credit model a Rasch model?
    Massof RW
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):114-31. PubMed ID: 22805357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. How should we assess the fit of Rasch-type models? Approximating the power of goodness-of-fit statistics in categorical data analysis.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Montaño R
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):116-33. PubMed ID: 25107521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
    Demars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Using the Rasch measurement model to design a report writing assessment instrument.
    Carlson WR
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 23442325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.