These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934873)

  • 1. Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case.
    Marret E; Elia N; Dahl JB; McQuay HJ; Møiniche S; Moore RA; Straube S; Tramèr MR
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Dec; 111(6):1279-89. PubMed ID: 19934873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology].
    Rittner HL; Kranke P; Schäfer M; Roewer N; Brack A
    Anaesthesist; 2009 Dec; 58(12):1199-209. PubMed ID: 19902152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do clinical experts rely on the Cochrane library?
    Grimes DA; Hou MY; Lopez LM; Nanda K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):420-2. PubMed ID: 18238981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; McGowan J; Daniel R; Rader T; Iansavichene AE; Ji J; Ansari MT; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):755-62. PubMed ID: 18586179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials.
    Gardner W; Lidz CW; Hartwig KC
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 15837444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews.
    Sutton AJ; Donegan S; Takwoingi Y; Garner P; Gamble C; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18783919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Fraudulent data in studies of postoperative pain].
    Raeder J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Aug; 129(16):1658-9. PubMed ID: 19721486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to read a review paper.
    Callcut RA; Branson RD
    Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S60-9. PubMed ID: 19892076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infectious diseases: how are they done and what are their strengths and limitations?
    Leibovici L; Falagas ME
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 19393904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews of workplace injury interventions: what are we missing?
    Lipscomb HJ; Pompeii LA; Myers DJ; Schoenfisch AL; Dement JM
    Med Lav; 2009; 100(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 19764180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
    Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Chemonucleolysis and intradiscal electrothermal therapy: what is the current evidence?].
    Felder-Puig R; Gyimesi M; Mittermayr T; Geiger-Gritsch S
    Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):936-44. PubMed ID: 19780005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: original data versus systematic reviews in the medical literature.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1265):U2804. PubMed ID: 18264184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.
    Haines T; McKnight L; Duku E; Perry L; Thoma A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18298993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.