These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934873)

  • 21. [Fraudulent pain research: a hurt so deep nothing can alleviate it].
    Rama-Maceiras P; Ingelmo II; Fàbregas JN; Hernández-Palazón J
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2009; 56(6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19725345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?
    Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative alternatives to narrative reviews for understanding existing research literature.
    Fitzgerald SM; Rumrill PD
    Work; 2005; 24(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 15912021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care systematic reviews in issue three for 2008 of The Cochrane Library.
    Wiffen PJ
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 19296358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: a reply from a group producing systematic reviews.
    Weir R; Bidwell S
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2843. PubMed ID: 18264210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Introduction to systematic reviews.
    Goodwin GM; Geddes JR
    J Psychopharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 15260914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Understanding statistical terms. 5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Aug; 47(8):95-6. PubMed ID: 19654420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Sheiban I
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Aug; 5(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 19736151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The formidable fraud of Dr. Scott Reuben].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Mar; 5(196):698-9. PubMed ID: 19462617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature.
    Avenell A; Stewart F; Grey A; Gamble G; Bolland M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031909. PubMed ID: 31666272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Systematic reviews: much ado about a lot.
    Citrome L
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 63(6):832-3. PubMed ID: 19490190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Should we exclude inadequately reported studies from qualitative systematic reviews? An evaluation of sensitivity analyses in two case study reviews.
    Carroll C; Booth A; Lloyd-Jones M
    Qual Health Res; 2012 Oct; 22(10):1425-34. PubMed ID: 22865107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews.
    Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 17611957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Johnson NP; Khan KS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19281584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practice.
    Schriger DL; Altman DG; Vetter JA; Heafner T; Moher D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 39(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 20093305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in issue one for 2009 of the Cochrane Library.
    Wiffen PJ
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 19492219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can decision making in general surgery be based on evidence? An empirical study of Cochrane Reviews.
    Diener MK; Wolff RF; von Elm E; Rahbari NN; Mavergames C; Knaebel HP; Seiler CM; Antes G
    Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):444-61. PubMed ID: 19715801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in issue four for 2008 of the Cochrane Library.
    Wiffen PJ
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 19492218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in medical rehabilitation].
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Aug; 47(4):199. PubMed ID: 18704868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.