91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19934920)
41. An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions.
Sepucha K; Ozanne E; Silvia K; Partridge A; Mulley AG
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 17023138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Population-based assessment of the surgical management of locally advanced colorectal cancer.
Govindarajan A; Coburn NG; Kiss A; Rabeneck L; Smith AJ; Law CH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1474-81. PubMed ID: 17047196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Anorectal and urinary dysfunction after surgery for rectal cancer.
Herman RM; Thor PJ; Sobocki J; Walega P; Nowakowskii M; Królczyk G
Folia Med Cracov; 2004; 45(3-4):63-71. PubMed ID: 16261880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Late rectal symptoms and quality of life after conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Geinitz H; Zimmermann FB; Thamm R; Erber C; Müller T; Keller M; Busch R; Molls M
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jun; 79(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 16733072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prospective analysis of quality of life and survival following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Camilleri-Brennan J; Steele RJ
Br J Surg; 2001 Dec; 88(12):1617-22. PubMed ID: 11736975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Influence of intraoperative and postoperative radiotherapy on functional outcome in patients undergoing standard and deep anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Kienle P; Abend F; Dueck M; Abel U; Treiber M; Riedl S
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 May; 49(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 16550319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Quality of life after low anterior resection and temporary loop ileostomy.
Tsunoda A; Tsunoda Y; Narita K; Watanabe M; Nakao K; Kusano M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Feb; 51(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 18172730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.
Meredith KL; Hoffe SE; Shibata D
Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Feb; 89(1):177-215, ix-x. PubMed ID: 19186236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Patient preferences between surgical and medical treatment in Crohn's disease.
Byrne CM; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Selby W; Harrison JD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 May; 50(5):586-97. PubMed ID: 17380368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management.
Richman MB; Forman EH; Bayazit Y; Einstein DB; Resnick MI; Stovsky MD
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2310-8. PubMed ID: 16280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long-term follow-up of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial.
Birgisson H; Påhlman L; Gunnarsson U; Glimelius B;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(34):8697-705. PubMed ID: 16314629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Patient explicit consideration of tradeoffs in decision making about rectal cancer treatment: benefits for decision process and quality of life.
Pieterse AH; Kunneman M; van den Hout WB; Baas-Thijssen M; Geijsen ED; Ceha HM; Muller KM; van der Linden YM; Marijnen CAM; Stiggelbout AM
Acta Oncol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 30971150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences: an application in oncology.
Pieterse AH; Stiggelbout AM; Marijnen CA
Health Expect; 2010 Dec; 13(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 20550594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Implementing patient decision support tools: moving beyond academia?
Harrison JD; Masya L; Butow P; Solomon M; Young J; Salkeld G; Whelan T
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jul; 76(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 19157763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Fit and misfit.
Crighton MH; Lingler JH; Happ MB
Res Gerontol Nurs; 2011 Jan; 4(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 21210575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Controversies in the management of rectal cancer. A survey of French surgeons, oncologists and radiotherapists.
Lefevre JH; Benoist S
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Feb; 18(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 26679469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Recommendations for clinical practice. Therapeutic choices for rectal cancer. How can we reduce therapeutic sequelae and preserve quality of life?].
Alves A
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2007 Jan; 31 Spec No 1():1S52-62, 1S95-7. PubMed ID: 17569477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [A method for predicting the efficiency of rehabilitative treatment based on decision tree analysis].
Zaĭtsev AA; Levitskiĭ EF; Khodashanskiĭ IA; Barabash LV; Plotnikov OO
Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult; 2010; (5):35-8. PubMed ID: 21328904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Patients' perspectives and the perceptions of healthcare providers in the treatment of early rectal cancer; a qualitative study.
Smits LJH; van Lieshout AS; Debets S; Spoor S; Moons LMG; Peeters KCMJ; van Oostendorp SE; Damman OC; Janssens RJPA; Lameris W; van Grieken NCT; Tuynman JB
BMC Cancer; 2023 Dec; 23(1):1266. PubMed ID: 38129790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Whose utilities for decision analysis?
Boyd NF; Sutherland HJ; Heasman KZ; Tritchler DL; Cummings BJ
Med Decis Making; 1990; 10(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 2182963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
