These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings. Perez D; Bramkamp M; Exe C; von Ruden C; Ziegler A Am J Surg; 2010 Jan; 199(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19362288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings. Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wound prevalence, types, and treatments in home care. Pieper B; Templin TN; Dobal M; Jacox A Adv Wound Care; 1999 Apr; 12(3):117-26. PubMed ID: 10655791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of neonatal and pediatric wounds: a retrospective examination of clinical outcomes. Baharestani MM Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Jun; 53(6):75-85. PubMed ID: 17586874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial of topical negative pressure wound closure in India. Mody GN; Nirmal IA; Duraisamy S; Perakath B Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Dec; 54(12):36-46. PubMed ID: 19104122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds]. Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology. Mosher BA; Cuddigan J; Thomas DR; Boudreau DM Adv Wound Care; 1999 Mar; 12(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 10326360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effective managed care: gel versus wet-to-dry for debridement. Mulder GD Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):68-70, 72, 74 passim. PubMed ID: 7598779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting. Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local wound care in the diabetic. Dunn JM Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1987 Apr; 4(2):413-8. PubMed ID: 2952250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hanging wet-to-dry dressings out to dry. Ovington LG Home Healthc Nurse; 2001 Aug; 19(8):477-83; quiz 484. PubMed ID: 11982183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A guide to the properties and uses of silver dressings in wound care. Lansdown AB Prof Nurse; 2005 Jan; 20(5):41-3. PubMed ID: 15682997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Mouës CM; Vos MC; van den Bemd GJ; Stijnen T; Hovius SE Wound Repair Regen; 2004; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 14974959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds. McCallon SK; Knight CA; Valiulus JP; Cunningham MW; McCulloch JM; Farinas LP Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):28-32, 34. PubMed ID: 11189545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using wound care products to promote a healing environment. Maklebust J Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 1996 Jun; 8(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 8716383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]