BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19935373)

  • 1. Everolimus with very low-exposure cyclosporine a in de novo kidney transplantation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
    Salvadori M; Scolari MP; Bertoni E; Citterio F; Rigotti P; Cossu M; Dal Canton A; Tisone G; Albertazzi A; Pisani F; Gubbiotti G; Piredda G; Busnach G; Sparacino V; Goepel V; Messa P; Berloco P; Montanaro D; Veroux P; Federico S; Bartezaghi M; Corbetta G; Ponticelli C
    Transplantation; 2009 Nov; 88(10):1194-202. PubMed ID: 19935373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can cyclosporine blood level be reduced to half after heart transplantation?
    Wang SS; Chou NK; Chi NH; Huang SC; Wu IH; Wang CH; Yu HY; Chen YS; Tsao CI; Ko WJ; Shun CT
    Transplant Proc; 2010 Apr; 42(3):930-3. PubMed ID: 20430207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal everolimus concentration is associated with risk reduction for acute rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients.
    Chan L; Hartmann E; Cibrik D; Cooper M; Shaw LM
    Transplantation; 2010 Jul; 90(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20517177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial of steroid avoidance in renal transplant patients treated with everolimus and cyclosporine.
    Montagnino G; Sandrini S; Casciani C; Schena FP; Carmellini M; Civati G; Rigotti P; Cossu M; Altieri P; Salvadori M; Federico S; Stefoni S; Cambi V; Albertazzi A; Buoncristiani U; Berloco P; Segoloni G; Boschiero L; Sparacino V; Donati D; Turello E; Dal Canton A; Ponticelli C
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Mar; 37(2):788-90. PubMed ID: 15848532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Everolimus and reduced cyclosporine trough levels in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
    Schweiger M; Wasler A; Prenner G; Stiegler P; Stadlbauer V; Schwarz M; Tscheliessnigg K
    Transpl Immunol; 2006 Jun; 16(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 16701176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of sirolimus plus tacrolimus versus sirolimus plus cyclosporine in high-risk renal allograft recipients: results from an open-label, randomized trial.
    Gaber AO; Kahan BD; Van Buren C; Schulman SL; Scarola J; Neylan JF;
    Transplantation; 2008 Nov; 86(9):1187-95. PubMed ID: 19005398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A phase III prospective, randomized study to evaluate concentration-controlled sirolimus (rapamune) with cyclosporine dose minimization or elimination at six months in de novo renal allograft recipients.
    Baboolal K
    Transplantation; 2003 Apr; 75(8):1404-8. PubMed ID: 12717239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized exploratory trial of steroid avoidance in renal transplant patients treated with everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine.
    Montagnino G; Sandrini S; Iorio B; Schena FP; Carmellini M; Rigotti P; Cossu M; Altieri P; Salvadori M; Stefoni S; Corbetta G; Ponticelli C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Feb; 23(2):707-14. PubMed ID: 17890244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine minimization versus cyclosporine elimination in de novo renal allograft patients receiving sirolimus.
    Tedesco-Silva H; Garcia VD; Contieri FL; De Boni Monteiro de Carvalho D; Noronha IL; Gonçalves RT; de Paula FJ; Abbud-Filho M; Manfro RC; David-Neto E; Alfieri F; Ikehara E; Jiang Q; Tai SS; Medina-Pestana JO
    Transplant Proc; 2010 Jun; 42(5):1659-66. PubMed ID: 20620495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sirolimus-based therapy with or without cyclosporine: long-term follow-up in renal transplant patients.
    Morales JM; Campistol JM; Kreis H; Mourad G; Eris J; Schena FP; Grinyo JM; Nanni G; Andres A; Castaing N; Brault Y; Burke JT
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Mar; 37(2):693-6. PubMed ID: 15848504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Similar lipid profile but improved long-term outcomes with sirolimus after cyclosporine withdrawal compared to sirolimus with continuous cyclosporine.
    Morales JM; Hartmann A; Walker R; Arns W; Senatorski G; Grinyó JM; Shoker A; Wilczek H; Jamieson NV; Lelong M; Brault Y; Burke JT; Scarola JA;
    Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(6):2339-44. PubMed ID: 19715914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher incidence of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with low everolimus exposure.
    Romagnoli J; Citterio F; Favi E; Salerno MP; Tondolo V; Spagnoletti G; Renna R; Castagneto M
    Transplant Proc; 2007; 39(6):1823-6. PubMed ID: 17692622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression early after renal transplantation: an interim analysis.
    Bemelman FJ; de Maar EF; Press RR; van Kan HJ; ten Berge IJ; Homan van der Heide JJ; de Fijter HW
    Transplantation; 2009 Aug; 88(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 19667948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaction between everolimus and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: a pharmacokinetic controlled trial.
    Pascual J; del Castillo D; Cabello M; Pallardó L; Grinyó JM; Fernández AM; Brunet M
    Transplantation; 2010 Apr; 89(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 20335831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of everolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients: 12- and 36-month results.
    Levy G; Schmidli H; Punch J; Tuttle-Newhall E; Mayer D; Neuhaus P; Samuel D; Nashan B; Klempnauer J; Langnas A; Calmus Y; Rogiers X; Abecassis M; Freeman R; Sloof M; Roberts J; Fischer L
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Nov; 12(11):1640-8. PubMed ID: 16598777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cyclosporine reduction in the presence of everolimus: 3-month data from a Canadian pilot study of maintenance cardiac allograft recipients.
    Ross H; Pflugfelder P; Haddad H; Cantarovich M; White M; Ignaszewski A; Howlett J; Vaillancourt M; Dorent R; Burton JR;
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Feb; 27(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 18267227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in renal transplant recipients under treatment with cyclosporine and Myfortic.
    Brunet M; Crespo M; Millán O; Serón D; Torregrosa V; Jiménez O; Moreso F; Martorell J; Grinyo JM; Oppenheimer F
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Sep; 39(7):2160-2. PubMed ID: 17889124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Better actual 10-year renal transplant outcomes of 80% reduced cyclosporine exposure with sirolimus base therapy compared with full cyclosporine exposure without or with concomittant sirolimus treatment.
    Pliszczynski J; Kahan BD
    Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3657-68. PubMed ID: 22172822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
    Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
    Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results of kidney transplantation with cyclosporine- and everolimus-based immunosuppression.
    Iaria G; Pisani F; Iorio B; Lucchesi C; De Luca L; Ielpo B; D'Andria D; Tariciotti L; Tisone G
    Transplant Proc; 2006 May; 38(4):1018-9. PubMed ID: 16757249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.