These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19936469)
1. The peer review process in health journals. Vettore MV Cad Saude Publica; 2009 Nov; 25(11):2306-7. PubMed ID: 19936469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review in medical journals. Morgan P Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6521):646. PubMed ID: 3081207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer Review for Scientific Journals: Challenges and Way Forward. Dangal G; Hamal PK; Dangal O J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2019 Jan; 16(41):I-II. PubMed ID: 30739915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to Scientific journals are 'faith based': is there a science behind peer review? Schroter S J R Soc Med; 2007 Mar; 100(3):117-8. PubMed ID: 17339301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Smith R J R Soc Med; 2006 Apr; 99(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 16574968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers. Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The process of a peer-reviewed journal. Pearson GS Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2013 Jul; 49(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 23819663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific Journals are "faith based": is there science behind peer review? Linkov F; Lovalekar M; Laporte R J R Soc Med; 2006 Dec; 99(12):596-8. PubMed ID: 17139057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice. Jull G; Moore A Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Apr; 40():v. PubMed ID: 30773425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Submission of articles to Vaccine: a fast and fair peer review process. de Hon F; Poland GA Vaccine; 2013 Jul; 31(32):3207-8. PubMed ID: 23726824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical editor lambasts journals and editors. Smith R BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7314):651. PubMed ID: 11566822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology. Brock WJ Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Art of Peer Review. Fraser D Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists. Gelenberg AJ J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Support for peer review. Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Publication of AKD and quality, publication level of cardiology journals]. Timuralp B Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2006 Jun; 6(2):113-4. PubMed ID: 16766271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]