These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

846 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19936826)

  • 1. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
    Sampaio Góes JC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allergan's silicone gel breast implants.
    Spear SL; Hedén P
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Sep; 4(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 17850205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
    Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
    Khan UD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transaxillary Subfascial Augmentation Mammaplasty with Anatomic Form-Stable Silicone Implants.
    Munhoz AM; Gemperli R; Sampaio Goes JC
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 42(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 26408444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Augmentation mammaplasty: where should the implant be placed?
    Takayanagi S; Nakagawa C; Sugimoto Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 15170249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.
    Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Breast augmentation: indications, types of prostheses, surgical techniques, complications, results].
    Bettex S; Gailloud-Matthieu MC; Raffoul W; Egloff DV
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1999 Sep; 119(9):729-37. PubMed ID: 10528515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The clinic analysis of complications of varied breast implant].
    Chen WL; Li QF; Lei H; Zhu C; Zhang B; Yu L; Wang J
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(3):172-4. PubMed ID: 16128096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study of 708 form-stable silicone gel breast implants.
    Stevens WG; Hirsch EM; Tenenbaum MJ; Acevedo M
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Sep; 30(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 20884898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses.
    Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17399656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years.
    Maxwell GP; Van Natta BW; Murphy DK; Slicton A; Bengtson BP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):709-17. PubMed ID: 22751081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the use of silicone implants in breast surgery.
    Chao AH; Garza R; Povoski SP
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016; 13(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 26690709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of tuberous breast deformity with anatomic cohesive silicone gel breast implants.
    Panchapakesan V; Brown MH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18752021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
    Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Back-to-front flipping of implants following augmentation mammoplasty and the role of physical characteristics in a round cohesive gel silicone breast implant: retrospective analysis of 3458 breast implants by a single surgeon.
    Khan UD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Feb; 35(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 20665020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.