These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19936971)

  • 1. Review of papers describing neuroinformatics software.
    De Schutter E; Ascoli GA; Kennedy DN
    Neuroinformatics; 2009 Dec; 7(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 19936971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial.
    Kullmann DM
    Brain; 2018 Dec; 141(12):3279. PubMed ID: 30496364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial.
    LaVoie MJ
    Brain Res; 2021 Feb; 1752():147294. PubMed ID: 33444619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Passages 2014.
    Hof PR
    J Comp Neurol; 2014 Jan; 522(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24464684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of neuroinformatics.
    Kennedy DN
    Neuroinformatics; 2005; 3(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 16284411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Review of 2008 for PLoS Computational Biology.
    Browne E; Dickin R; Bourne PE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jan; 5(1):e1000275. PubMed ID: 19180176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rebooting review.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):319. PubMed ID: 25850037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research papers, gender bias and peer-review.
    Battarbee R
    Biol Lett; 2017 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 28794278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informatics united: exemplary studies combining medical informatics, neuroinformatics and bioinformatics.
    Wiemer J; Schubert F; Granzow M; Ragg T; Fieres J; Mattes J; Eils R
    Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 12743648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Science in flux: Registered reports and beyond at the European Journal of Neuroscience.
    Chambers CD; Forstmann B; Pruszynski JA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 49(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 30584679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does your code stand up to scrutiny?
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):142. PubMed ID: 29517015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The editors' guide for peer review of papers submitted to Endoscopy.
    Dinis-Ribeiro M; Vakil N; Ponchon T
    Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 23254406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial: Transparency Must Prevail.
    Bernard C
    eNeuro; 2017; 4(5):. PubMed ID: 28932810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Room at the top.
    Schekman R
    Elife; 2017 Oct; 6():. PubMed ID: 29021081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tackling waste in publishing through portable peer review.
    Bell GP; Kvajo M
    BMC Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):146. PubMed ID: 30558673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practice, politics, and papers.
    Wijdicks EF
    Neurocrit Care; 2009; 10(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19127449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bad papers by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2005 Mar; 118(Pt 6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 15764593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing the costs of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [From paper to Internet-based manuscript submission].
    Schroeder TV; Kitaj T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Jan; 167(1):25. PubMed ID: 15675159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physics. Journal plans faster thumbs-down for rejected papers.
    Cho A
    Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5741):1660. PubMed ID: 16150983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.