These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1993747)

  • 21. Evaluation of the ID 32E for the identification of Gram-negative glucose-fermenting and glucose-non-fermenting bacilli.
    O'Hara CM; Miller JM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 1999 May; 5(5):277-281. PubMed ID: 11856267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of autoscan-4 for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gavini F; Husson MO; Izard D; Bernigaud A; Quiviger B
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):1586-8. PubMed ID: 3049662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of API NH, a new 2-hour system for identification of Neisseria and Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis in a routine clinical laboratory.
    Barbé G; Babolat M; Boeufgras JM; Monget D; Freney J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jan; 32(1):187-9. PubMed ID: 8126177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Robinson A; McCarter YS; Tetreault J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 33(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 7714193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of an automated system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Arzese A; Minisini R; Botta GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Feb; 13(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8013485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE; Alexander GA; Paxson R; Alderson GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Jun; 79(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 6342361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
    Murray PR; Gauthier A; Niles A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 6386866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study.
    Winstanley TG; Limb DI; Wheat PF; Nicol CD
    J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 8157751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Four hour identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the API Rapid 20E and Micro-ID systems.
    Holmes B; Humphry PS
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1132-8. PubMed ID: 3902898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Jacobs MR; Buick MK; Flanagan MM; Gymer GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 4(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 3905400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Rapid ATB Staph for 5-hour antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus. Groupement pour le Dépistage, L'Etude et la Prévention des Infections Hospitalières-Groep ter Opsporing, Studie en Preventie van Infecties in de Ziekenhuizen.
    Struelens MJ; Nonhoff C; van der Auwera P; Mertens R; Serruys E
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 33(9):2395-9. PubMed ID: 7494035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Four-hour presumptive identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures.
    Smith EG; Pritchard JK; McCarthy LR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Jan; 75(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 7006379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Evaluation of a new semi-automatic method of identifying enterobacteriaceae, M.I.S.-Enterobacteriaceae].
    Scheftel JM; Barth JG; Vincent M
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1989; 47(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2665580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the enterotube system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Martin WJ; Yu PK; Washington JA
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Jul; 22(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 4939124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.