388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1993790)
1. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?
Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is accurate rate response programming necessary?
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and VVIR pacing.
Jutzy RV; Florio J; Isaeff DM; Marsa RJ; Bansal RC; Jutzy KR; Levine PA; Feenstra L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1838-46. PubMed ID: 1704551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Activity-sensing rate responsive versus conventional fixed-rate pacing: a comparison of rate behavior and patient well-being during routine daily exercise.
Candinas RA; Gloor HO; Amann FW; Schoenbeck M; Turina M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 1):204-13. PubMed ID: 1706506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics.
Rickli H; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Maccarter DJ; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10709225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapatient comparison between chronic VVIR and DDD pacing in patients affected by high degree AV block without heart failure.
Menozzi C; Brignole M; Moracchini PV; Lolli G; Bacchi M; Tesorieri MC; Tosoni GD; Bollini R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1816-22. PubMed ID: 1704547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of atrioventricular asynchrony on platelet activation: implication of thromboembolism in paced patients.
Lau CP; Tse HF; Cheng G
Heart; 1997 Oct; 78(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 9404251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices.
Sulke N; Dritsas A; Bostock J; Wells A; Morris R; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1992 Jan; 67(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 1739528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of atrio-ventricular delay programming in patients with DDDR pacemakers.
Sulke AN; Chambers JB; Sowton E
Eur Heart J; 1992 Apr; 13(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 1600983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.
Oldroyd KG; Rae AP; Carter R; Wingate C; Cobbe SM
Br Heart J; 1991 Apr; 65(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 1827588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cardiac pacing modes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Jutzy RV; Houston-Feenstra L; Levine PA
Chest; 1994 Jan; 105(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 8275792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of life in patients with complete heart block and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of permanent DDIR versus DDDR pacing with mode switch to DDIR.
Provenier F; Boudrez H; Deharo JC; Djiane P; Jordaens L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 22(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 10192855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
