These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19937924)

  • 21. The relationship between verdict, defendant characteristics, and type of crime in sex-related criminal cases.
    Beck JC; Borenstein N; Dreyfus J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 3730627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining the effectiveness of a restorative justice program for various types of juvenile offenders.
    Bergseth KJ; Bouffard JA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Sep; 57(9):1054-75. PubMed ID: 22811474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptions and coping with punishment: how registered sex offenders respond to stress, internet restrictions, and the collateral consequences of registration.
    Tewksbury R; Zgoba KM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Aug; 54(4):537-51. PubMed ID: 19561135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Legal Perceptions of Lesbian Intimate Partner Violence.
    Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Renzetti CM
    J Interpers Violence; 2017 Mar; 32(5):635-658. PubMed ID: 25990382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of moral judgment and empathy in young sex offenders: a comparison of clinical judgment and test results.
    van Vugt E; Asscher J; Hendriks J; Stams GJ; Bijleveld C; van der Laan P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 Oct; 56(7):986-96. PubMed ID: 21862524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interactive effects of characteristics of defendant and mock juror on U.S. participants' judgment and sentencing recommendations.
    Abwender DA; Hough K
    J Soc Psychol; 2001 Oct; 141(5):603-15. PubMed ID: 11758038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sex offender registration and recidivism risk in juvenile sexual offenders.
    Caldwell MF; Dickinson C
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(6):941-56. PubMed ID: 19937920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlates of sex offender and offense traits by victim age.
    Harry B; Pierson TR; Kuznetsov A
    J Forensic Sci; 1993 Sep; 38(5):1068-74. PubMed ID: 8228878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acquaintance rape: the effect of race of defendant and race of victim on white juror decisions.
    Hymes RW; Leinart M; Rowe S; Rogers W
    J Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 133(5):627-34. PubMed ID: 8283859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Women don't do such things! Characteristics of female sex offenders and offender types.
    Wijkman M; Bijleveld C; Hendriks J
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):135-56. PubMed ID: 20237394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of sexual orientation in the courtroom: a double standard.
    Hill JM
    J Homosex; 2000; 39(2):93-111. PubMed ID: 10933283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of classification criteria for juvenile sex offenders.
    Kemper TS; Kistner JA
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):172-90. PubMed ID: 20406992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of incest offenders based on victim age.
    Firestone P; Dixon KL; Nunes KL; Bradford JM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 15985666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders.
    Letourneau EJ; Armstrong KS
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 18948430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A prospective analysis of juvenile male sex offenders: characteristics and recidivism rates as adults.
    Vandiver DM
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):673-88. PubMed ID: 16574639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attributions of guilt and punishment as functions of physical attractiveness and smiling.
    Abel MH; Watters H
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 145(6):687-702. PubMed ID: 16334514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 12645046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.