161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19938355)
1. [First experience and preliminary clinical results with the cervical disc replacement DISCOVER].
Greiner-Perth R; Allam Y; Silbermann J; Simank HG
Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 19938355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Jagannathan J; Sherman JH; Szabo T; Shaffrey CI; Jane JA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 19441994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adjacent level fusion surgery: a prospective study.
Phillips FM; Allen TR; Regan JJ; Albert TJ; Cappuccino A; Devine JG; Ahrens JE; Hipp JA; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):556-65. PubMed ID: 19240664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Solid radiographic fusion with a nonconstrained device 5 years after cervical arthroplasty.
Heary RF; Goldstein IM; Getto KM; Agarwal N
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):951-5. PubMed ID: 25303618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement.
Mehren C; Suchomel P; Grochulla F; Barsa P; Sourkova P; Hradil J; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2802-6. PubMed ID: 17108833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.
Goffin J; van Loon J; Van Calenbergh F; Lipscomb B
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Mar; 12(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 20192625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement. A four-year prospective monocentric study].
Barna M; Stulík J; Kryl J; Vyskočil T; Nesnídal P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 23286683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.
Shim CS; Lee SH; Park HJ; Kang HS; Hwang JH
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):465-70. PubMed ID: 17021408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
Burkus JK; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):308-18. PubMed ID: 20809722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new minimally invasive posterior approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy: surgical technique and preliminary results.
Boehm H; Greiner-Perth R; El-Saghir H; Allam Y
Eur Spine J; 2003 Jun; 12(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 12687439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervical disc arthroplasty (Prodisc-C): analysis of 3 to 4- year follow up results].
Hrabálek L; Vaverka M; Houdek M
Rozhl Chir; 2009 Nov; 88(11):634-41. PubMed ID: 20662444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: determination by CT and effects on clinical outcomes.
Tu TH; Wu JC; Huang WC; Guo WY; Wu CL; Shih YH; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Apr; 14(4):457-65. PubMed ID: 21294610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement.
Lee JH; Jung TG; Kim HS; Jang JS; Lee SH
Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):676-82. PubMed ID: 20537598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
Heidecke V; Burkert W; Brucke M; Rainov NG
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 May; 150(5):453-9; discussion 459. PubMed ID: 18421412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
