These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19938370)

  • 1. Seeds of collaboration.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7267):1158-9. PubMed ID: 19938370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. America recovers: stimulus-response.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2011 Sep; 477(7366):524-5. PubMed ID: 21956310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indirect costs: keeping the lights on.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7527):326-9. PubMed ID: 25409809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Universities unnerved by revised rules for sharing NIH research.
    Jennings C
    Nature; 2004 Aug; 430(7003):953. PubMed ID: 15329680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An unhealthy obsession.
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):7. PubMed ID: 23236611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of NIH funds placed under a spotlight.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7059):601. PubMed ID: 16193003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science agencies prepare for cuts.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):158-9. PubMed ID: 23407517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research management: What would you cut?
    Garman D; Cohen A; Jones B; Goldston D
    Nature; 2013 Jul; 499(7457):147-8. PubMed ID: 23846645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limit the number of grants per person.
    Sachs F
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6639):222. PubMed ID: 9230423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Putin promises science boost.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2012 Mar; 483(7389):253-4. PubMed ID: 22422235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Starvation diet.
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7438):401-2. PubMed ID: 23451351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grant applications: Undo NIH policy to ease effect of cuts.
    Benezra R
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7433):480. PubMed ID: 23344348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing the business of science.
    Boron WF
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2009 Feb; 24():2-3. PubMed ID: 19196646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health are so painful.
    Garrison HH; McGuire KI; Palazzo RE
    Physiologist; 2007 Aug; 50(4):129, 131-3. PubMed ID: 17883021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Funding: flirting with disaster.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7455):527-8. PubMed ID: 23814812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. North America.
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S60-3. PubMed ID: 25390145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National Institutes of Health Funding for Hearing Loss Research.
    Blustein J
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jul; 145(7):687-689. PubMed ID: 31095262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research funding. Science funding and short-term economic activity.
    Weinberg BA; Owen-Smith J; Rosen RF; Schwarz L; Allen BM; Weiss RE; Lane J
    Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6179):41-3. PubMed ID: 24700844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NerveCenter: Changes in store for R01 grants?
    Stone K
    Ann Neurol; 2011 Mar; 69(3):A13-4. PubMed ID: 21446016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.