165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19938409)
1. [The utility of remote monitoring in the follow-up of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices].
Mäkelä T; Uusimaa P; Koivisto UM; Raatikainen P
Duodecim; 2009; 125(19):2059-65. PubMed ID: 19938409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective analysis.
Schoenfeld MH; Compton SJ; Mead RH; Weiss DN; Sherfesee L; Englund J; Mongeon LR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):757-63. PubMed ID: 15189530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Remote monitoring of automatic implantable cardiovascular devices (pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization)].
Guevara-Valdivia ME
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2009; 79(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 19902671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.
Varma N
Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 18035071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical and practical aspects of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients in Poland - preliminary results.
Przybylski A; Zakrzewska-Koperska J; Maciag A; Derejko P; Orczykowski M; Szumowski L; Walczak F
Kardiol Pol; 2009 May; 67(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 19521935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remote monitoring of patients with implanted devices: data exchange and integration.
Van der Velde ET; Atsma DE; Foeken H; Witteman TA; Hoekstra WH
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 20(2 Suppl):8-12. PubMed ID: 23702984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wireless cardiac event alert monitoring is feasible and effective in the emergency department and adjacent waiting areas.
Pollack CV
Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 8(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 19258832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trial design of the clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision: the Clinical evaluation Of remote NotificatioN to rEduCe Time to clinical decision (CONNECT) study.
Crossley G; Boyle A; Vitense H; Sherfesee L; Mead RH
Am Heart J; 2008 Nov; 156(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 19061696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.
Hernández-Madrid A; Lewalter T; Proclemer A; Pison L; Lip GY; Blomstrom-Lundqvist C;
Europace; 2014 Jan; 16(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 24344325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Remote continuous cardiac arrhythmias detection and monitoring.
Zhou H; Hou KM; Ponsonnaille J; Gineste L; Coudon J; de Sousa G; de Vaulx C; Li JJ; Chainais P; Aufrère R; Amamra A; Chanet JP
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 105():112-20. PubMed ID: 15718600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prospective analysis of remote ICD monitoring.
Scher DL
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov; 27(11):1581; author reply 1581-2. PubMed ID: 15546323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.
Crossley GH; Chen J; Choucair W; Cohen TJ; Gohn DC; Johnson WB; Kennedy EE; Mongeon LR; Serwer GA; Qiao H; Wilkoff BL;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):2012-9. PubMed ID: 19926006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Remote management of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: an application of telemedicine].
Ganière V; Burri H
Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Mar; 7(285):548-50, 552-3. PubMed ID: 21488395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study.
Ip J; Waldo AL; Lip GY; Rothwell PM; Martin DT; Bersohn MM; Choucair WK; Akar JG; Wathen MS; Rohani P; Halperin JL;
Am Heart J; 2009 Sep; 158(3):364-370.e1. PubMed ID: 19699858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and economic impact of remote monitoring on the follow-up of patients with implantable electronic cardiovascular devices: an observational study.
Costa PD; Reis AH; Rodrigues PP
Telemed J E Health; 2013 Feb; 19(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 23336734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SMARTDIAB: a communication and information technology approach for the intelligent monitoring, management and follow-up of type 1 diabetes patients.
Mougiakakou SG; Bartsocas CS; Bozas E; Chaniotakis N; Iliopoulou D; Kouris I; Pavlopoulos S; Prountzou A; Skevofilakas M; Tsoukalis A; Varotsis K; Vazeou A; Zarkogianni K; Nikita KS
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 May; 14(3):622-33. PubMed ID: 20123578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remote Active Monitoring in Patients with Heart Failure (RAPID-RF): design and rationale.
Saxon LA; Boehmer JP; Neuman S; Mullin CM
J Card Fail; 2007 May; 13(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 17517341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remote patient management using implantable devices.
Movsowitz C; Mittal S
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2011 Jun; 31(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 21328042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of a remote monitoring system for implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Masella C; Zanaboni P; Di Stasi F; Gilardi S; Ponzi P; Valsecchi S
J Telemed Telecare; 2008; 14(6):290-4. PubMed ID: 18776073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wireless vital sign telemetry to hand held computers.
Gandsas A; Montgomery K; McIntire K; Altrudi R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():153-7. PubMed ID: 11317730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
