BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19939357)

  • 1. Simulating an enactment effect: Pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension.
    Ditman T; Brunyé TT; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 19939357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When you and I share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension.
    Brunyé TT; Ditman T; Mahoney CR; Augustyn JS; Taylor HA
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 19076318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. You heard it here first: readers mentally simulate described sounds.
    Brunyé TT; Ditman T; Mahoney CR; Walters EK; Taylor HA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 20621285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mentally simulating narrative perspective is not universal or necessary for language comprehension.
    Brunyé TT; Ditman T; Giles GE; Holmes A; Taylor HA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1592-1605. PubMed ID: 26889684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case of the missing pronouns: does mentally simulated perspective play a functional role in the comprehension of person?
    Sato M; Bergen BK
    Cognition; 2013 Jun; 127(3):361-74. PubMed ID: 23545386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural indicators of inference processes in text comprehension: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Friese U; Rutschmann R; Raabe M; Schmalhofer F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2110-24. PubMed ID: 18416672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of motor simulations on language comprehension.
    Casteel MA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):211-8. PubMed ID: 21763635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms underlying inference generation in familiar and less-familiar scenarios.
    Sundermeier BA; Virtue SM; Marsolek CJ; van den Broek P
    Brain Lang; 2005 Dec; 95(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 16298670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.
    Sparks JR; Rapp DN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):230-47. PubMed ID: 21244116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving through imagined space: Mentally simulating locomotion during spatial description reading.
    Brunyé TT; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 20144826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic mental representations in language comprehension.
    Qu C; Luo YJ; Mo L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):933-48. PubMed ID: 19725327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure.
    Duggan GB; Payne SJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):228-42. PubMed ID: 19751073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.
    Wolfe MB; Woodwyk JM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):341-62. PubMed ID: 20128958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Representing a described sequence of events: a dynamic view of narrative comprehension.
    Kelter S; Kaup B; Claus B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):451-64. PubMed ID: 14979817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Embodiment during reading: Simulating a story character's linguistic actions.
    Gunraj DN; Drumm-Hewitt AM; Klin CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):364-75. PubMed ID: 24219085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of text type, topic familiarity, and stuttering frequency on listener recall, comprehension, and mental effort.
    Panico J; Healey EC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):534-46. PubMed ID: 19064906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas.
    Ferretti TR; Singer M; Patterson C
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 18675957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability.
    Arnell KM; Joanisse MF; Klein RM; Busseri MA; Tannock R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 19739900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of prior knowledge and elaboration in text comprehension and memory: a comparison of self-generated elaboration and text-provided elaboration.
    Kim SI; Van Dusen LM
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(3):353-78. PubMed ID: 9805361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric asymmetries in discourse processing: evidence from false memories for lists and texts.
    Ben-Artzi E; Faust M; Moeller E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 18951910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.