These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19939967)

  • 1. Probabilistic expert systems for forensic inference from DNA markers in horses: applications to confirm genealogies with lack of genetic data.
    Dobosz M; Bocci C; Bonuglia M; Grasso C; Merigioli S; Russo A; De Iuliis P
    J Hered; 2010; 101(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 19939967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting anonymous DNA samples from mass disasters--probabilistic forensic inference using genetic markers.
    Lin TH; Myers EW; Xing EP
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e298-306. PubMed ID: 16873485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case of multiple assignments (paternity/maternity) in an equine-out breeding system.
    Castagnasso EE; Kienast ME; García PP; Giovambattista G
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):889-90. PubMed ID: 17524055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic DNA and bioinformatics.
    Bianchi L; Liò P
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 17384432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [DNA research proofs identity of horses and cows].
    Haneveld JK
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2011 Nov; 136(11):808-9. PubMed ID: 22164471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic identification of missing persons: DNA analysis of human remains and compromised samples.
    Alvarez-Cubero MJ; Saiz M; Martinez-Gonzalez LJ; Alvarez JC; Eisenberg AJ; Budowle B; Lorente JA
    Pathobiology; 2012; 79(5):228-38. PubMed ID: 22722562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of microsatellites and parentage testing in saltwater crocodiles.
    Isberg SR; Chen Y; Barker SG; Moran C
    J Hered; 2004; 95(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 15388772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian inference of errors in ancient DNA caused by postmortem degradation.
    Mateiu LM; Rannala BH
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Jul; 25(7):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18420593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 20457080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parentage testing in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) using semi-automated fluorescent multiplex PCRs with 10 microsatellite markers.
    Agapito J; Rodríguez J; Herrera-Velit P; Timoteo O; Rojas P; Boettcher PJ; García F; Espinoza JR
    Anim Genet; 2008 Apr; 39(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 18261186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites.
    Marklund S; Ellegren H; Eriksson S; Sandberg K; Andersson L
    Anim Genet; 1994 Feb; 25(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8161016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of candidate sire number and sire relatedness on DNA polymorphism-based measures of exclusion probability and probability of unambiguous parentage.
    Sherman GB; Kachman SD; Hungerford LL; Rupp GP; Fox CP; Brown MD; Feuz BM; Holm TR
    Anim Genet; 2004 Jun; 35(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 15147394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FINEX: a Probabilistic Expert System for forensic identification.
    Cowell RG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Jul; 134(2-3):196-206. PubMed ID: 12850417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
    Gomez-Raya L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobile element-based forensic genomics.
    Ray DA; Walker JA; Batzer MA
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 616(1-2):24-33. PubMed ID: 17161440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The usefulness of SNP markers for analyses of highly degraded biological materials].
    Babol-Pokora K; Prośniak A; Jacewicz R; Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 20073261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.