These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19940342)

  • 41. Reconstructions of chest phantoms by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.
    Isaacson D; Mueller JL; Newell JC; Siltanen S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):821-8. PubMed ID: 15250634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A computer simulation of radio-frequency ablation of the endocardium.
    Labonté S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Sep; 41(9):883-90. PubMed ID: 7959815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Anterior-posterior impedance cardiography: a new approach to accurate, non-invasive monitoring of cardiac function.
    Babbs CF
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2010 Jun; 10(2):52-65. PubMed ID: 20204513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Magnetic induction at 60 Hz in the human heart: a comparison between the in situ and isolated scenarios.
    Dawson TW; Caputa K; Stuchly MA
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1999; 20(4):233-43. PubMed ID: 10230937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sensitivity distributions of impedance cardiography using band and spot electrodes analyzed by a three-dimensional computer model.
    Kauppinen PK; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(4):694-702. PubMed ID: 9662161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The measurement of cardiac output in dogs by impedance cardiography with different electrode arrangements.
    Adamicza A; Tutsek L; Daróczy B; Bari F; Nagy S
    Acta Physiol Hung; 1994; 82(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 7976395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A simulation study on the effect of thoracic conductivity inhomogeneities on sensitivity distributions.
    Yang F; Patterson RP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 36(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 18299989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
    Wei XF; Grill WM
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Modeling current density distributions during transcutaneous cardiac pacing.
    Panescu D; Webster JG; Stratbucker RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jun; 41(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 7927374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Current distribution under electrodes in relation to stimulation current and skin blood flow: are modern electrodes really providing the current distribution during stimulation we believe they are?
    Petrofsky J; Schwab E; Cúneo M; George J; Kim J; Almalty A; Lawson D; Johnson E; Remigo W
    J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(6):368-81. PubMed ID: 17060165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A nonlinear finite element model of the electrode-electrolyte-skin system.
    Panescu D; Webster JG; Stratbucker RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jul; 41(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 7927389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Electrical impedance tomography; the construction and application to physiological measurement of electrical impedance images.
    Brown BH; Barber DC
    Med Prog Technol; 1987; 13(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 3441245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sequential finite element model of tissue electropermeabilization.
    Sel D; Cukjati D; Batiuskaite D; Slivnik T; Mir LM; Miklavcic D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 15887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Origins of the impedance change in impedance cardiography by a three-dimensional finite element model.
    Kim DW; Baker LE; Pearce JA; Kim WK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1988 Dec; 35(12):993-1000. PubMed ID: 3220505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Noninvasive monitoring of transient cardiac changes with impedance cardiography.
    Zhang H; Li JK
    Cardiovasc Eng; 2008 Dec; 8(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 19130223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electrical defibrillation optimization: an automated, iterative parallel finite-element approach.
    Hutchinson SA; Ng KT; Shadid JN; Nadeem A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Apr; 44(4):278-89. PubMed ID: 9125810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Optimal electrode array for ambulatory measuring of cardiac output based on the electrical impedance method].
    Song Y; Gao S; Ikrashi A; Yamakoshi K
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):32-5, 57. PubMed ID: 21485178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Magnetic fields from simulated cardiac action currents.
    Barach JP; Wikswo JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Oct; 41(10):969-74. PubMed ID: 7959804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Simulation of intraluminal impedance.
    al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():48-52. PubMed ID: 12724867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.