232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19940658)
21. Colonic polyp segmentation in CT colonography-based on fuzzy clustering and deformable models.
Yao J; Miller M; Franaszek M; Summers RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 15554123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Teniae coli-based circumferential localization system for CT colonography: feasibility study.
Huang A; Roy DA; Summers RM; Franaszek M; Petrick N; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 17456877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A straightforward approach to computer-aided polyp detection using a polyp-specific volumetric feature in CT colonography.
Lee JG; Hyo Kim J; Hyung Kim S; Sun Park H; Ihn Choi B
Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):790-801. PubMed ID: 21762887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography.
Gryspeerdt SS; Herman MJ; Baekelandt MA; van Holsbeeck BG; Lefere PA
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 14986055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change.
Jang JK; Park SH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26798215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection: Effect on radiologist observers of polyp identification by CAD on both the supine and prone scans.
Summers RM; Liu J; Rehani B; Stafford P; Brown L; Louie A; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash B; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ; Petrick N
Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):948-59. PubMed ID: 20542452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CT colonography: clinical evaluation of a method for automatic coregistration of polyps at follow-up surveillance studies.
Helbren E; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ; Halligan S
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):417-24. PubMed ID: 24991991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A CAD of fully automated colonic polyp detection for contrasted and non-contrasted CT scans.
Tulum G; Bolat B; Osman O
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Apr; 12(4):627-644. PubMed ID: 28101760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Matching 3-D prone and supine CT colonography scans using graphs.
Wang S; Petrick N; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Wei Z; Summers RM
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 Jul; 16(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 22552585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography.
Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH
Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital bowel cleansing free colonic polyp detection method for fecal tagging CT colonography.
Oda M; Kitasaka T; Mori K; Suenaga Y; Takayama T; Takabatake H; Mori M; Natori H; Nawano S
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Polyp enhancing level set evolution of colon wall: method and pilot study.
Konukoglu E; Acar B; Paik DS; Beaulieu CF; Rosenberg J; Napel S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(12):1649-56. PubMed ID: 18092735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of 3D surface fitting for robust polyp detection and classification in CT colonography.
Chowdhury TA; Whelan PF; Ghita O
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Dec; 30(8):427-36. PubMed ID: 16919911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automated teniae coli detection and identification on computed tomographic colonography.
Wei Z; Yao J; Wang S; Liu J; Summers RM
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):964-75. PubMed ID: 22320805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving initial polyp candidate extraction for CT colonography.
Zhu H; Fan Y; Lu H; Liang Z
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 55(7):2087-102. PubMed ID: 20299733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A statistical 3-D pattern processing method for computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography.
Göktürk SB; Tomasi C; Acar B; Beaulieu CF; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Napel S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1251-60. PubMed ID: 11811825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Endoluminal surface registration for CT colonography using haustral fold matching.
Hampshire T; Roth HR; Helbren E; Plumb A; Boone D; Slabaugh G; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):946-58. PubMed ID: 23845949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automatic prone to supine haustral fold matching in CT colonography using a Markov random field model.
Hampshire T; Roth H; Hu M; Boone D; Slabaugh G; Punwani S; Halligan S; Hawkes D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 1):508-15. PubMed ID: 22003656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
