74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19941940)
1. Human choice behaviour in a frequently changing environment.
Krägeloh CU; Zapanta AE; Shepherd D; Landon J
Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19941940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
Jiménez AA; Aparicio CF
Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19615608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Aase H; Sagvolden T
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 May; 47(5):457-71. PubMed ID: 16671929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
Elliffe D; Davison M
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and alternative reinforcer delay on preference for alcohol during a multiple-choice procedure.
Benson TA; Little CS; Henslee AM; Correia CJ
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2009 Feb; 100(1-2):161-3. PubMed ID: 19013028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamics of choice and frequency of environment change.
Aparicio CF
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 18406077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
Davison M; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
Reed DD; Luiselli JK; Magnuson JD; Fillers S; Vieira S; Rue HC
Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
Davison M; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concurrent performance in a three-alternative choice situation: response allocation in a Rock/Paper/Scissors game.
Kangas BD; Berry MS; Cassidy RN; Dallery J; Vaidya M; Hackenberg TD
Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 19555744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the terminal-link effect depend on duration or reinforcement rate?
Grace RC; Bragason O
Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15182927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
Ong EL; White KG
Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
McLean AP; Grace RC; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
