74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19941940)
21. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relative and absolute reinforcement frequency as determinants of choice in concurrent variable interval schedules.
Shah K; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1991 Feb; 43(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 2017573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
Landon J; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
Wogar MA; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism.
Bukala M; Hu MY; Lee R; Ward-Horner JC; Fienup DM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 25688839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regulatory fit and systematic exploration in a dynamic decision-making environment.
Otto AR; Markman AB; Gureckis TM; Love BC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 20438274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.
Savastano HI; Fantino E
J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 8207353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
Alessandri J; Cançado CR
Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Timeout from a high-force requirement as a reinforcer: an effective procedure for human operant research.
Alessandri J; Rivière V
Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():1-6. PubMed ID: 23751256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rat choice in rapidly changing concurrent schedules.
McLean AP; Grace RC; Shevchouk OT; Cording JR
J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):313-335. PubMed ID: 29450892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Choice in a variable environment: visit patterns in the dynamics of choice.
Baum WM; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):85-127. PubMed ID: 15113135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.
Davison M; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):65-89. PubMed ID: 11831784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiple variable interval schedule behaviour in humans: effects of ethanol, mood, and reinforcer size on responding maintained by monetary reinforcement.
Glautier S; Bankart J; Rigney U; Willner P
Behav Pharmacol; 1998 Nov; 9(7):619-30. PubMed ID: 9862087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules.
Ward-Horner JC; Pittenger A; Pace G; Fienup DM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):623-7. PubMed ID: 24825241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Environment tracking and signal following in a reinforcer-ratio reversal procedure.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():208-224. PubMed ID: 30315866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An effect of inter-trial duration on the gambler's fallacy choice bias.
Militana E; Wolfson E; Cleaveland JM
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):455-9. PubMed ID: 20176090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Choice predicts the feedback negativity.
McGill S; Buckley J; Elliffe D; Corballis PM
Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1800-1811. PubMed ID: 28752549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules.
Horne PJ; Lowe CF
J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):29-60. PubMed ID: 8433066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of point-loss punishers on human signal-detection performance.
Lie C; Alsop B
J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Jul; 92(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 20119520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
