These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19941980)

  • 1. Mechanistic aspects of the fracture toughness of elk antler bone.
    Launey ME; Chen PY; McKittrick J; Ritchie RO
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Apr; 6(4):1505-14. PubMed ID: 19941980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rising crack-growth-resistance behavior in cortical bone: implications for toughness measurements.
    Vashishth D
    J Biomech; 2004 Jun; 37(6):943-6. PubMed ID: 15111083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of inner mechanism of anisotropic mechanical property of antler bone.
    Fang Z; Chen B; Lin S; Ye W; Xiao H; Chen X
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Dec; 88():1-10. PubMed ID: 30114597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture toughening mechanism of cortical bone: an experimental and numerical approach.
    An B; Liu Y; Arola D; Zhang D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):983-92. PubMed ID: 21783108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental validation of a microcracking-based toughening mechanism for cortical bone.
    Vashishth D; Tanner KE; Bonfield W
    J Biomech; 2003 Jan; 36(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 12485646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the structure and mechanical properties of bovine femur bone and antler of the North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis).
    Chen PY; Stokes AG; McKittrick J
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Feb; 5(2):693-706. PubMed ID: 18951859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histocompositional organization and toughening mechanisms in antler.
    Skedros JG; Keenan KE; Cooper DML; Bloebaum RD
    J Struct Biol; 2014 Aug; 187(2):129-148. PubMed ID: 24981169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The significance of crack-resistance curves to the mixed-mode fracture toughness of human cortical bone.
    Zimmermann EA; Launey ME; Ritchie RO
    Biomaterials; 2010 Jul; 31(20):5297-305. PubMed ID: 20409579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanistic aspects of fracture and R-curve behavior in human cortical bone.
    Nalla RK; Kruzic JJ; Kinney JH; Ritchie RO
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jan; 26(2):217-31. PubMed ID: 15207469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhomogeneous fibril stretching in antler starts after macroscopic yielding: indication for a nanoscale toughening mechanism.
    Krauss S; Fratzl P; Seto J; Currey JD; Estevez JA; Funari SS; Gupta HS
    Bone; 2009 Jun; 44(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 19236962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mechanical properties of red deer antler bone when used in fighting.
    Currey JD; Landete-Castillejos T; Estevez J; Ceacero F; Olguin A; Garcia A; Gallego L
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Dec; 212(Pt 24):3985-93. PubMed ID: 19946076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of human cortical bone across multiple length-scales at physiological strain rates.
    Zimmermann EA; Gludovatz B; Schaible E; Busse B; Ritchie RO
    Biomaterials; 2014 Jul; 35(21):5472-81. PubMed ID: 24731707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrafibrillar plasticity through mineral/collagen sliding is the dominant mechanism for the extreme toughness of antler bone.
    Gupta HS; Krauss S; Kerschnitzki M; Karunaratne A; Dunlop JW; Barber AH; Boesecke P; Funari SS; Fratzl P
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():366-82. PubMed ID: 23707600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anisotropy of age-related toughness loss in human cortical bone: a finite element study.
    Ural A; Vashishth D
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1606-14. PubMed ID: 17054962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of aging on the transverse toughness of human cortical bone: evaluation by R-curves.
    Koester KJ; Barth HD; Ritchie RO
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1504-13. PubMed ID: 21783160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying Novel Clinical Surrogates to Assess Human Bone Fracture Toughness.
    Granke M; Makowski AJ; Uppuganti S; Does MD; Nyman JS
    J Bone Miner Res; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1290-300. PubMed ID: 25639628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From brittle to ductile fracture of bone.
    Peterlik H; Roschger P; Klaushofer K; Fratzl P
    Nat Mater; 2006 Jan; 5(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 16341218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toughness and damage susceptibility in human cortical bone is proportional to mechanical inhomogeneity at the osteonal-level.
    Katsamenis OL; Jenkins T; Thurner PJ
    Bone; 2015 Jul; 76():158-68. PubMed ID: 25863123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture toughness and fatigue crack propagation rate of short fiber reinforced epoxy composites for analogue cortical bone.
    Chong AC; Miller F; Buxton M; Friis EA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 17655469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the effect of X-ray irradiation on the deformation and fracture behavior of human cortical bone.
    Barth HD; Launey ME; Macdowell AA; Ager JW; Ritchie RO
    Bone; 2010 Jun; 46(6):1475-85. PubMed ID: 20206724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.