103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1994437)
1. Simple test pattern for mammographic screen-film contact measurement.
Tanner RL
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):883-4. PubMed ID: 1994437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved tool for testing screen-film contact in mammography.
Mount CJ; Gray JE
Radiographics; 1990 Nov; 10(6):1049-54. PubMed ID: 2259760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
Friedrich MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting film-screen mammographic image quality.
Mathis JH
J Clin Eng; 1995; 20(5):376-87. PubMed ID: 10152444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mammographic screen-film systems.
Sickles EA
Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():52-7. PubMed ID: 3589132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography.
Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):277-82. PubMed ID: 7735767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AAPM tutorial. Physics of mammography: image recording process.
Yaffe MJ
Radiographics; 1990 Mar; 10(2):341-63. PubMed ID: 2183301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality control programme in mammography: second level quality controls.
Nassivera E; Nardin L
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):612-8. PubMed ID: 9227255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality assurance in radiology: quality control of radiographic cassettes].
Ferretti PP; Sarti M; Messori P; Boni L; Seligardi P; Tassoni D; Cattini V; Piccagli V; Barani A; Bianchi C; Borasi G; Troiso A; Soliani Raschini C
Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 8975314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.
Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Rueter FG; Antonsen RG; Slayton RJ
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
Sprawls P; Kitts EL
Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of image quality on 28 mammography X-ray sets in the UK.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1131-8. PubMed ID: 9536904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic artifact due to film.
Margolies L
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):552-3. PubMed ID: 9680594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
