These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19944651)

  • 1. A biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc system composed of a cubic three-dimensional fabric.
    Shikinami Y; Kawabe Y; Yasukawa K; Tsuta K; Kotani Y; Abumi K
    Spine J; 2010 Feb; 10(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 19944651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
    Cunningham BW
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core.
    Moumene M; Geisler FH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1840-51. PubMed ID: 17762291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stiffness of prosthetic nucleus determines stiffness of reconstructed lumbar calf disc.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP
    Spine J; 2004; 4(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 15125847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total disc replacement arthroplasty using the AcroFlex lumbar disc: a non-human primate model.
    Cunningham BW; Lowery GL; Serhan HA; Dmitriev AE; Orbegoso CM; McAfee PC; Fraser RD; Ross RE; Kulkarni SS
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S115-23. PubMed ID: 12384732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
    Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
    Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and evaluation of the FlexiCore metal-on-metal intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Valdevit A; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):276S-288S. PubMed ID: 15541677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fill of the nucleus cavity affects mechanical stability in compression, bending, and torsion of a spine segment, which has undergone nucleus replacement.
    Arthur A; Cannella M; Keane M; Singhatat W; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20473120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.