These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945041)

  • 21. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 for magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lee KA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 23(6):337-44. PubMed ID: 25463408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Guide to mammography reports: BI-RADS terminology.
    Bittner RB
    Am Fam Physician; 2010 Jul; 82(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 20642263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.
    Orel SG; Kay N; Reynolds C; Sullivan DC
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 10352614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology].
    Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the wrong tree?
    Heilbrunn KS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):593-4. PubMed ID: 8109502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Asymmetric mammographic findings based on the fourth edition of BI-RADS: types, evaluation, and management.
    Youk JH; Kim EK; Ko KH; Kim MJ
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(1):e33. PubMed ID: 19036720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) or French "classification ACR" What tool for what use? A point of view.
    Dilhuydy MH
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 17184950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Expressiveness of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS).
    Starren J; Johnson SM
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1997; ():655-9. PubMed ID: 9357707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. BI-RADS: use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties.
    Stines J
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 17178447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language?
    Vanel D
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):183. PubMed ID: 17164078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evolution of Imaging in Breast Cancer.
    Garcia EM; Crowley J; Hagan C; Atkinson LL
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):322-35. PubMed ID: 27029017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast calcifications: which are malignant?
    Muttarak M; Kongmebhol P; Sukhamwang N
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):907-13; quiz 914. PubMed ID: 19787181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation.
    Samardar P; de Paredes ES; Grimes MM; Wilson JD
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 11796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
    Shen WC; Chang RF; Moon WK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1688-98. PubMed ID: 17681678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical implications of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions associated with microcalcification: a radiology-pathology correlation study.
    Sanders MA; Roland L; Sahoo S
    Breast J; 2010; 16(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19929890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.
    Edwards SD; Lipson JA; Ikeda DM; Lee JM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 23928239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.