199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945048)
1. NCRP Report Number 160: its significance to medical imaging.
Mahesh M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):890-2. PubMed ID: 19945048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure--are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists?
Schauer DA; Linton OW
Health Phys; 2009 Jul; 97(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19509507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. IT tools will be critical in helping reduce radiation exposure from medical imaging.
Prevedello LM; Sodickson AD; Andriole KP; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 19179242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bomb survivors and radiation protection.
Lodico A
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19584366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Before we cry wolf.
van Moore A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):263-4. PubMed ID: 17467604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ionizing radiation. The question of responsible use: Pandora's box revisited.
Soares DP; Gilligan P
West Indian Med J; 2004 Mar; 53(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 15199724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation protection.
Brusin JH
Radiol Technol; 2007; 78(5):378-92; quiz 393-5. PubMed ID: 17519374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Valentin J;
Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Panel discussion.
Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):196-203. PubMed ID: 16896698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vendor question and answer panel.
Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):237-9. PubMed ID: 16896699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. watches efforts in Europe to slash CT radiation load.
Krotz D
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Oct; 21(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 10623313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical radiation: too much of a good thing?
Harv Mens Health Watch; 2011 Dec; 16(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 22299200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of radiation dose in medical imaging.
Hansen RA
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):42-4. PubMed ID: 20092172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilization strategies for cumulative dose estimates: a review and rational assessment.
Durand DJ; Dixon RL; Morin RL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):480-5. PubMed ID: 22748788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NCRP report 160 and what it means for medical imaging and nuclear medicine.
Bolus NE
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 24179182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The imaging imperative meets concerns about radiation exposure.
Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):265-6. PubMed ID: 17467605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. International conference on radiation protection in medicine: setting the scene for the next decade.
Corbett RH
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):251-5. PubMed ID: 23455038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Unnecessary imaging and radiation risk: the perfect storm for radiologists.
Cascade PN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):709-11. PubMed ID: 17411687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic imaging - increased radiation burden due to a larger proportion of modern imaging].
Weiss M
Rofo; 2012 Nov; 184(11):977. PubMed ID: 23104479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cumulative dose estimates rationally used have a distinct role in patient management and care.
Birnbaum S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):486-7. PubMed ID: 22748789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
