BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945096)

  • 1. 'Goals' are not an integral component of imitation.
    Leighton J; Bird G; Heyes C
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 19945096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. General processes, rather than "goals," explain imitation errors.
    Bird G; Brindley R; Leighton J; Heyes C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1158-69. PubMed ID: 17924814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weak imitative performance is not due to a functional 'mirroring' deficit in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
    Leighton J; Bird G; Charman T; Heyes C
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1041-9. PubMed ID: 18177677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT; Cunnington R; Williams MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action.
    van Schie HT; van Waterschoot BM; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1493-500. PubMed ID: 19045988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control.
    Sebanz N; Lackner U
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):859-76. PubMed ID: 17045811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infants show stability of goal-directed imitation.
    Sakkalou E; Ellis-Davies K; Fowler NC; Hilbrink EE; Gattis M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Jan; 114(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23073368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspective taking promotes action understanding and learning.
    Lozano SC; Hard BM; Tversky B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1405-21. PubMed ID: 17154781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals.
    Longo MR; Kosobud A; Bertenthal BI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):489-501. PubMed ID: 18377184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociable aspects of imitation: a study in autism.
    Hobson RP; Hobson JA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Nov; 101(3):170-85. PubMed ID: 18572186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What activates the human mirror neuron system during observation of artificial movements: bottom-up visual features or top-down intentions?
    Engel A; Burke M; Fiehler K; Bien S; Rösler F
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2033-42. PubMed ID: 18339409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The brain's intention to imitate: the neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation.
    Bien N; Roebroeck A; Goebel R; Sack AT
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2338-51. PubMed ID: 19153108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):138-47. PubMed ID: 21288259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.
    Press C; Bird G; Walsh E; Heyes C
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?
    Brass M; Heyes C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Oct; 9(10):489-95. PubMed ID: 16126449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical encoding of behavior: translating perception into action.
    Hard BM; Lozano SC; Tversky B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):588-608. PubMed ID: 17087575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming.
    Liepelt R; Cramon DY; Brass M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):578-91. PubMed ID: 18505325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.