129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945206)
1. The effects of phase duration on defibrillation success of dual time constant biphasic waveforms.
Shan Y; Ristagno G; Fuller M; Sun S; Li Y; Weil MH; Russell J; Tang W
Resuscitation; 2010 Feb; 81(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 19945206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of second and third phase duration on defibrillation efficacy of triphasic rectangle waveforms.
Tang C; Wang P; Gong Y; Wei L; Li Y; Zhang S
Resuscitation; 2016 May; 102():57-62. PubMed ID: 26939971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).
Morrison LJ; Dorian P; Long J; Vermeulen M; Schwartz B; Sawadsky B; Frank J; Cameron B; Burgess R; Shield J; Bagley P; Mausz V; Brewer JE; Lerman BB;
Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 15992986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms.
Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of biphasic waveforms on outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.
Chang YT; Tang W; Wang J; Brewer JE; Freeman G; Sun S; Weil MH
Crit Care Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):3024-8. PubMed ID: 17075369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations.
Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Average current is better than peak current as therapeutic dosage for biphasic waveforms in a ventricular fibrillation pig model of cardiac arrest.
Chen B; Yu T; Ristagno G; Quan W; Li Y
Resuscitation; 2014 Oct; 85(10):1399-404. PubMed ID: 25010783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model.
Li Y; Wang H; Cho JH; Didon JP; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19604618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the defibrillation efficacy for 5-ms waveforms.
Guan D; Malkin R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Apr; 15(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 15089995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental verification of theoretical predictions concerning the optimum defibrillation waveform.
Malkin RA; Jackson SR; Nguyen J; Yang Z; Guan D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16916083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks, waveform rounding, and synchronized shock delivery.
Kidwai BJ; McIntyre A; Anderson J; Adgey AA
J Electrocardiol; 2002 Jul; 35(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 12122614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of defibrillation efficacy between different impedance compensation techniques in high impedance porcine model.
Li Y; Ristagno G; Yu T; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1312-7. PubMed ID: 19720442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration.
Tang AS; Yabe S; Wharton JM; Dolker M; Smith WM; Ideker RE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jan; 13(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 2909569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External exponential biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform: efficacy in ventricular fibrillation of longer duration.
Yamanouchi Y; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Mowrey KA; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1481-7. PubMed ID: 10588150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current is better than energy as predictor of success for biphasic defibrillatory shocks in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.
Ristagno G; Yu T; Quan W; Freeman G; Li Y
Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 23032689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children.
Berg MD; Samson RA; Meyer RJ; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Berg RA
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16199288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants.
Keane D; Aweh N; Hynes B; Sheahan RG; Cripps T; Bashir Y; Zaidi A; Fahy G; Lowe M; Doherty P; Kroll MK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 30(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 17461867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-tilt monophasic and biphasic waveforms compared with standard biphasic waveforms in the transvenous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation.
Bennett JR; Darragh KM; Walsh SJ; Allen DJ; Scott M; Stevenson M; Adgey JA; Anderson JM; Manoharan G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 37(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 24102186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
