93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19945276)
1. A double blind comparison of the variability of block levels assessed using a hand help Neurotip or a Neuropen at elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
Shirgaonkar AT; Purva M; Russell IF
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2010 Jan; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 19945276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised comparison of a hand-held Neurotip and the Neuropen for assessing loss of touch sensation during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Soundararajan N; Russell I
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Jul; 16(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 17337179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of cold, pinprick and touch for assessing the level of spinal block at caesarean section.
Russell IF
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2004 Jul; 13(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 15321392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized, observer-blind comparison between the Neurotip mounted Neuropen and a disposable plastic neurological wheel for assessing the level of spinal blockade at cesarean section.
Wolin JA; Carter TR; Baysinger CL; Han X; Shotwell M; Downing JW
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2014 May; 23(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 24569062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of a Neuropen monofilament and ethyl chloride for assessing loss of touch sensation during combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Walsh P; Columb M; Russell R
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2010 Oct; 19(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 20832279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing blocks after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: how different questions affect findings from the same stimulus.
Nor NM; Russell IF
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2013 Nov; 22(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 23962471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of block height for satisfactory spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Ousley R; Egan C; Dowling K; Cyna AM
Anaesthesia; 2012 Dec; 67(12):1356-63. PubMed ID: 23061397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.
Horstman DJ; Riley ET; Carvalho B
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 19095857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post dural puncture headache after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a comparison of 25 g Quincke, 27 g Quincke and 27 g Whitacre spinal needles.
Shaikh JM; Memon A; Memon MA; Khan M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(3):10-3. PubMed ID: 19610505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensory assessment of epidural block for Caesarean section: a systematic comparison of pinprick, cold and touch sensation.
Camorcia M; Capogna G
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Jul; 23(7):611-7. PubMed ID: 16507187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Where is T5? A survey of anaesthetists.
Congreve K; Gardner I; Laxton C; Scrutton M
Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):453-5. PubMed ID: 16674620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being.
Kampe S; Tausch B; Paul M; Kasper SM; Bauer K; Diefenbach C; Kiencke P
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Jan; 20(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 14741065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. A comparison of two doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine.
De Simone CA; Leighton BL; Norris MC
Reg Anesth; 1995; 20(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 7605770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Development of incidence of post-dural puncture headache in patients undergoing caesarean section in spinal anaesthesia at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Olomouc during 2003-2004].
L'ubuský M; Berta E; Procházka M; Marek O; Kudela M
Cas Lek Cesk; 2006; 145(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 16634479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the lateral, Oxford and sitting positions for performing combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section.
Rucklidge MW; Paech MJ; Yentis SM
Anaesthesia; 2005 Jun; 60(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 15918823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of spinal anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain.
Schewe JC; Komusin A; Zinserling J; Nadstawek J; Hoeft A; Hering R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 19122553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined low-dose spinal-epidural anaesthesia versus single-shot spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery.
Ghazi A; Raja Y
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Jan; 16(1):90-1. PubMed ID: 17126009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Breakage of the distal portion of a double-caliber 25-29 GA Polymedic needle during intradural anesthesia for cesarean section].
Planas Liébanas E; López Montserrat JC; Gomar Sancho C
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2002 May; 49(5):277-8. PubMed ID: 12216512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is ephedrine infusion more effective at preventing hypotension than traditional prehydration during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in African parturients?
Desalu I; Kushimo OT
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2005 Oct; 14(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 16154346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison.
Tyagi A; Girotra G; Kumar A; Kumar S; Sethi AK; Mohta M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009 Jul; 18(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19447598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
